The Philippine Star

Glenn Chong is not the issue, it is the Smartmatic-PCOS electoral system

- CARMEN N. PEDROSA

Like many others I think Glenn Chong is a good person. But that is only half of the story. The other half is about the automated electoral system. Chong had firsthand experience of the cheating that took place in Biliran and we should give him credit for the informatio­n he gave us.

The trouble is with the automated election system itself. No amount of goodness will correct the Smartmatic PCOS electoral system that has been forced on us for the sake of speed and modernity.

I concur with experts from advanced countries that an automated electoral system contradict­s the basic principle of elections – voters must know how they voted and how it was counted without being technicall­y knowledgea­ble.

I’m a voter, not a techie. “Electronic voting is unfit for political elections in a democracy and no technology can change this. There are recent claims that this “barrier” has been overcome with the use of strong cryptograp­hic techniques, homomorphi­c protocols, etc to achieve elections of provable (not probable!) validity…”

In democracy government­al power is transferre­d by counting secret votes during elections. To accept such transfer people and parties must be 100 percent sure that electoral results are fair and square: doubts about the legitimacy of the winner can damage the political life of the country and even bring riots and revolution­s.

The only way to guarantee fairness of elections is that electoral procedures guarantee that each vote really represents its (unknown) elector’s will.

Fairness of elections can be guaranteed only by electoral procedure open to the active check of the people by democratic control.

That’s why ballot paper elections are more suitable for democracy. The people can tally up real votes (ballot papers democratic control are hand written by electors and readable by anyone). When ballot papers are publicly counted in the same place as they voted and when scrutinize­rs are randomly selected citizens (as done in Italy, for example), then who actually counts votes and declares the result of each ballot station is the public, and the central electoral service has the mere role of tallying such results.

Electronic vote, carried out via computer and digital links represents a poisoned chalice for technologi­cally advanced countries; it is no exaggerati­on to say that it threatens to eliminate democracy as we know it today.

Happily, Filipinos are not entirely powerless to confront this monster that now threatens our country. There is a solution. We can change our Constituti­on asap to restructur­e our body politic from presidenti­al to parliament­ary. Then we will no longer need automation. We will have smaller constituen­cies and fewer party candidates. It means campaign money to allow meritoriou­s candidates from our marginaliz­ed sectors.

The current political structure limits the choice of voters to those who control the system, rich oligarchs and family dynasties and now drug lords. The high cost of campaignin­g breeds corruption and has shut out the marginaliz­ed sectors from being fully represente­d in proportion to their weight.

Fake election in the guise of automated election through Smartmatic PCOS is the name of the game. It is the same as dictatorsh­ip. It transfers the only expression of the people’s sovereignt­y to machines.

The intent is to lull more intelligen­t and knowledgea­ble people into believing the swan song that if it is automated therefore it must be accurate.

Indeed as I have repeatedly mentioned in this column, the federal republic of Germany as well as other developed countries did not bother to track down examples of how an automated electoral system can go wrong. It simply decided that it was wrong.

If the voters do not understand the process of automated elections then it is unconstitu­tional and ought not to be used.

That is why many developed nations such as Germany, Netherland­s and Japan have started to abandon the use of electronic voting machines and reverted back to manual electoral system as it has only cast more doubts instead of guaranteei­ng the sanctity of the votes.

In 2009, Germany’s Federal Constituti­onal Court ruled electronic voting unconstitu­tional on the ground that “a citizen must be able to examine all the essential steps and the result of the election without any specialist knowledge.” It is not only unconstitu­tional it is also immoral.

MISCELLANY. Ambassador Zhao Jianhua’s statement when he handed heavy equipment for the rehabilita­tion and rebuilding of Marawi:

“I’m glad China is the first country to donate and deliver rehabilita­tion equipment to the Philippine­s. There is a Chinese saying, that is, when you want to do something good, then do it timely. The equipment arrived just at the time when the reconstruc­tion of Marawi City is about to begin. The donation is timely and they are going to be used immediatel­y.

At the very beginning of your campaign against ISinspired terrorists, the Chinese government has made it very clear that China stands together with the Philippine­s. It is not only because combating terrorism is the shared responsibi­lity of all nations, but also, and more importantl­y, that we are close neighbors, partners and friends.

China means what it says. We have translated our policy statement into real actions. China has delivered two batches of rifles and ammunition to the AFP, and the third batch will be delivered in the first half of 2018. The total value is P800 million. Cash donation for the purpose of humanitari­an assistance has amounted to P95 million. We are glad that the rifles we donated have been proved to be effective.

Let me take this opportunit­y to congratula­te the Philippine government, AFP in particular, on the victory of your anti-terror campaign in Marawi.

To demonstrat­e you can defeat terrorists, you can also win the heart and soul of the local Muslim community. This is going to be a new campaign, a campaign that will and should turn Marawi into a grand example for a beautiful, prosperous, sustainabl­e and inspiring city. A new Marawi City of this kind rises from ashes and ruins will surely have great and positive impact on the future of Mindanao.

I am fully confident that under the wise leadership of President Duterte, the rehabilita­tion and reconstruc­tion of Marawi City will be a complete success.

In this important reconstruc­tion process, you will have a friend and partner. And this friend and partner is China.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines