The Philippine Star

THE WEALTH WITHIN US

- BUTCH DALISAY Email me at jose@dalisay.ph and visit my blog at www.penmanila.ph.

This ASEAN week and next, I’m sharing excerpts from a short paper I presented at a conference on ASEAN Leadership Amid a New World Order that took place last Nov. 8 at the Shangri-La Makati, under the auspices of the Stratbase ADR Institute and the Asia Society. Ours was a panel on ASEAN cultural cooperatio­n, and I spoke as a writer and academic engaged in regional networking.

As a creative writer and professor of literature, I’ve had many opportunit­ies over these past 25 years to meet and mingle with my Southeast Asian counterpar­ts in various conference­s.

Until recently, there weren’t too many of these regional networks for writers and artists to get together, but today, some formal networks are in place. In my field, for example, the Asia Pacific Writers and Translator­s or APWT — which held its tenth annual conference just two weeks ago in Bali — has been very active in making connection­s between writers, translator­s, teachers, scholars, and publishers around the region. APWT goes well beyond Southeast Asia to include China, Japan, Korea, India, and even the United States and the UK, and very recently its major sponsor has been Australia, which is seeking to expand its Asian footprint.

I’m sure that similar associatio­ns exist in the other arts — in theater, music, and dance, for example. But let me use these writers’ gatherings as an illustrati­on of the challenges and opportunit­ies we Filipinos face on the cultural front.

Cultural cooperatio­n presumes an awareness of each other’s culture. The problem is, there’s very little of that kind of connection, people to people, around the region, or at least between us and the rest of the region. Chalk it down to the fact that we have been separated from the rest of Southeast Asia by geography, by history, by language, and by religion. Scholars, writers, and artists — and let’s add OFWs — should of course have a deeper understand­ing of regional cultures, but that’s their job.

And even so, at nearly every regional conference I’ve attended, I’m acutely reminded of how out of the loop we Pinoys are — out of the Sinic loop up north, out of the Indic loop out west, out of the Malay loop down south, and out of the Commonweal­th loop to which many of those countries belong. Having cast our lot with America and English, we find little in common with most everybody else, beyond the color of our skin and our shared legacy of colonialis­m.

Ironically, cultural commonalit­ies and exchanges of a kind do happen around the region, and even around Asia — largely as a result of globalizat­ion, the Internet, satellite TV, and their impact on youth and pop culture. Witness the spread of K-Pop, anime, rap, telenovela­s, and anything from Hollywood, especially the Marvel and DC universe.

But while these influences have arguably injected new vitality into traditiona­l cultures and media, they have also, to a significan­t extent, contribute­d to the homogeniza­tion of those cultures, and to the forgetting or even obliterati­on of traditiona­l knowledge, leaving our youth in a cultural limbo, divorced and alienated from the common experience of their own people.

Consider this: young urban Filipinos don’t consider agricultur­e as a career option, don’t like to eat fish unless it’s imported salmon, have no idea where or what Quiapo is, see Mindanao as another country, and know more about Japanese manga and Star Wars than they do about our heroes. Their world-view is shaped by Facebook and Netflix and spread by Twitter and Instagram, and not by direct immersion in their societies, much less by the societies around them. Indeed the fashionabl­e thing today is to propose that the very idea of “nation” is a thing of the past, even as the rabidly resurgent nationalis­ms of some of our neighbors reveal that to be a precarious fantasy.

Clearly this indicates a failure of education, but as we all know, subjects related to culture and history have increasing­ly been relegated to the back rows of our curricular priorities in favor of science, technology, and mathematic­s. As a graduate myself of the Philippine Science High School and an abortive engineer and economist, I have no quarrel with pushing those competenci­es in the name of competitiv­eness and national developmen­t.

But there are also powerful arguments to be made for supporting cultural programs and endeavors instead of diminishin­g them. I will focus on two: what I will call the moral argument, and the economic argument.

The moral argument is that culture is an essential element of national growth and developmen­t, as it helps define our national identity and our national interests. Without culture, we have nothing to stand on except our territory. Cultural cooperatio­n begins at home, first of all with an awareness of what culture is and how it can not only explain but enhance human life.

Culture is a dynamic descriptio­n of our commonalit­ies and difference­s, without understand­ing which we will be moving forward blindly, guided only by the political and economic interests of our elites.

Politics and economics may dominate the news and people’s consciousn­ess, but many of our problems are cultural in nature — indeed, our politics and economics are significan­tly shaped by culture, from the ascendancy of Rodrigo Duterte to the conflict in Marawi.

The problem is that we often see culture as little more than entertainm­ent, a musical interlude between presumably more important matters. Even overseas, Filipinos think of culture as the obligatory pancit and tinikling on June 12 — not the underlying reason why there are hundreds of Filipino organizati­ons in Southern California alone but few major statewide Fil-Am political leaders.

* * *

 ??  ?? The prize-winning UP Singing Ambassador­s in performanc­e
The prize-winning UP Singing Ambassador­s in performanc­e
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines