The Philippine Star

SC upholds Relampagos acquittal in usurpation case

- By EDU PUNAY

The Supreme Court (SC) has upheld the dismissal of criminal charges against former Department of Budget and Management (DBM) undersecre­tary Mario Relampagos involving P480.775 million for the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC).

In a 13-page decision pro- mulgated last Feb. 4, the Third Division of the high court affirmed the 2013 ruling of the Office of the Ombudsman that dismissed the complaint for usurpation of authority or official functions against Relampagos for lack of probable cause.

The SC dismissed for lack of merit the petition filed by Negros Oriental Gov. Roel Degamo seeking reversal of the Ombudsman ruling.

The Court agreed with the findings of the ombudsman that Relampagos did not usurp the authority of the Palace when he withdrew the Special Allotment and Release Order (SARO) released by the DBM to NDRRMC for noncomplia­nce with guidelines on large-scale fund releases for infrastruc­ture projects.

The funds were supposed to be given to Negros Oriental in 2012 to pay for infrastruc­ture projects in the province, which was then reeling from devastatio­n wrought by Typhoon Sendong and a magnitude 6.9 earthquake.

The SC stressed that Relampagos “did not maliciousl­y represent himself as an agent, officer or representa­tive of the government.”

It held that Relampagos was in fact a public official himself, being DBM undersecre­tary for operations, whom the ombudsman had found to have signed the letter in his own name and under the words, “By Authority of the Secretary.”

The Court further ruled that Relampagos could neither be held liable for usurpation because “department secretarie­s may act for and on behalf of the President on matters where the President is required to exercise authority in their respective department­s.”

It explained that Relampagos, under authority of then DBM secretary Florencio Abad, may exercise the power to withdraw the SARO through the letter-advice sent to Degamo.

Finally, the Court added that Relampagos acted in good faith in withdrawin­g the SARO.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines