The Philippine Star

Outright denials for missing informatio­n or documents

- WEBSITE: www.gurfinkel.com Follow us on Facebook.com/GurfinkelL­aw and Twitter @GurfinkelL­aw Four offices to serve you: PHILIPPINE­S: 8940258 or 8940239; LOS ANGELES; SAN FRANCISCO; NEW YORK: TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-866-GURFINKEL (1-866-487-3465) MICHAEL J. GU

When a person files a petition or applicatio­n, certain informatio­n and documents are required as part of the filing. For example, if a person is being petitioned by a spouse, a required document would be a marriage contract. If a required document is missing, the petition or applicatio­n may be denied.

Petitions and applicatio­ns have a list of documents that should be submitted along with the case. In the past, if informatio­n or documents were missing, the USCIS would serve a Request for Evidence (RFE), for the missing documents or informatio­n, and would give the person approximat­ely 84 days to respond. However, it seems USCIS is no longer bothering with serving RFEs, but instead is immediatel­y denying the case. This could have devastatin­g effects for people, because in some cases, USCIS may also issue a Notice to Appear (NTA) placing the person in removal proceeding­s because of the denial of their case.

In one case, a US citizen petitioned his spouse and concurrent­ly filed for her adjustment of status.

However, he neglected or overlooked that he needed to submit an affidavit of support. Rather than serving an RFE for the missing affidavit of support, USCIS denied the case outright. Now, the petitioner would either have to seek reconsider­ation or file a whole new case.

In a different case, the beneficiar­y had committed fraud, but did not submit a fraud waiver in the initial filing. Again, no RFE, but instead an outright denial.

In yet another case, a birth certificat­e was not included, and the case was denied without an RFE.

I know people want to save money on attorney fees by doing it themselves. They think their case is simple and straightfo­rward, so why do they need an attorney? But in this age of Trump, where USCIS seems to look for ways to deny cases, rather than approve them, it is like walking through a minefield or lion’s den when pursuing immigratio­n benefits.

While hiring an attorney does not absolutely “guarantee” success or approval (in fact attorneys are prohibited by law from guaranteei­ng results), I believe the chances of success are greatly improved when a person retains an attorney to assist them. This is because the attorney knows what supporting documents should be submitted when filing the case, can evaluate potential issues or problems and address those issues or concerns, etc. Moreover, with USCIS issuing outright denials and NTAs without providing an opportunit­y to submit documentat­ion, a person could find themselves in deportatio­n for something as minor as forgetting to include a birth certificat­e or marriage contract.

Your immigratio­n case (and your future in America) are not something where you should try to cut corners or save money by trying to do it yourself. Pres. Trump has made obtaining immigratio­n benefits much more difficult and riskier, such that legal representa­tion could greatly increase your chances for success.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines