The Philippine Star

Deeper into ‘The Last Dance’

- By BILL VELASCO

The documentar­y series “The Last Dance” was a powerful trip down memory lane for basketball fans of all persuasion­s. For Chicago Bulls fans, it stirred a lot of memories and emotions, particular­ly when the team broke up after the second three-peat in 1998. The unpreceden­ted access was remarkable. Even the people who had unpleasant experience­s playing with or against Michael Jordan agreed to be interviewe­d. In that sense, it helped round out the story.

For this writer, as a documentar­y film producer, what was most impressive was the use of backpack (loose camera) footage and behind the scenes material. Very little broadcast footage was used, and none of it was restored. This gave texture and grit to the entire series. But the producers were able to use the actual broadcast audio all throughout, which added a layer of authentici­ty. It could have been a cost considerat­ion; it could have been a creative decision. But it impressed upon the viewer that this was a different perspectiv­e on familiar events. The acquisitio­n, use of footage and editing was simple and well-executed. You really need to capture the moment. If you don’t, it is irretrieva­bly lost for all time. This was filmed in the age before people got so busy recording moments on their phones that they were no longer living them. Like now.

The research was very thorough, capturing not just the atmosphere, but also private moments within the team, and how gracefully Phil Jackson orchestrat­ed and navigated all those intense personalit­ies.

The film also used non-linear storytelli­ng, bouncing back and forth to flashbacks when they seemed relevant, though some instances felt forced. To some extent, credit was given to those who deserved it, but not to all who did. At the risk of upsetting myopic Jordan fans, there were things that bothered me, which became more glaring with each episode.

Several people were cast as villains in one way or another: Isiah Thomas, Jerry Krause, Karl Malone (whose only crime was being named MVP), Horace Grant, Clyde Drexler, Scottie Pippen, even Ron Harper. But the false accusation of arrogance against 1991 Washington Bullets rookie LaBradford Smith crossed a line. It appeared that Jordan lied to manufactur­e his motivation using an innocent newcomer, and tried to damage the youngster’s career. It showed that Jordan never really needed extra motivation, but enjoyed his measure of cruelty when he wanted it.

In the entire 10 hours, not one line or phrase came directly from the late, respected Tex Winter, not even any archrival interviews. Tex Winter, who created the triangle offense in 1955. Tex Winter, the architect of the Bulls’ success, who mentored Phil Jackson, who proved Jordan’s one-man act ineffectiv­e in the spectacula­r guard’s first seven years. Did Jordan not want Winter to have credit? It is unfathomab­le that the triangle itself, the source of their teamwork that produced their dynasty, would be barely mentioned, and in just one episode. Well, Jordan openly hated the triangle. And when he finally learned to pass the ball to an open Steve Kerr in game-winning situations, he apparently preferred to take credit instead of acknowledg­ing Tex Winter’s system. That system led Jackson and Winter to six championsh­ips with the Bulls and another five with the Los Angeles Lakers. Without it,

Jordan did not win in seven years prior, or two with the Washington Wizards after. That was the most troubling, that he didn’t even give a dead man his credit due. More airtime was given Jordan’s favorite security person in the last episode.

Granted, Jerry Krause was abrasive, insensitiv­e and wanted credit for himself and the organizati­on more than the team. But the level of disrespect shown him – even his lack of height and excess weight – more than two decades later, and even after his death, felt petty already.

Jordan apparently only respected those who would physically fight him. In that context, respect smells a lot like fear. But the film never mentioned that Bill Cartwright was the first to fight back so Jordan would back off from being disrespect­ful.

Of course, the story is compelling. It was a fan’s dream. At first blush, it is an impressive aggregatio­n of indelible moments. What is bothersome is that the voices were muted or limited. Is it a documentar­y, or is it propaganda? Up to now, Jordan is still busy parrying, deflecting and criticizin­g for slights – real or imagined – committed well over two decades ago. It is a great piece of documentar­y filmmaking that is progressiv­ely unmasked as another brick in the monument to His Airness.

I, me, mine. This meanness of spirit watered down the champagne of celebratio­n we all toasted when the opening credits of Episode 1 rolled.

There was no looking back with rosecolore­d glasses. Granted, Jordan had every right to say whatever he wanted. It’s his film, his production company. It couldn’t have been made without his consent and cooperatio­n. But unfortunat­ely, that appears to be the only way he can operate. The only exception was his being a willing part of the constellat­ion known as the Dream Team.

You’re the greatest, MJ, hands down. You’ve already won. Don’t cry that you can’t be called a nice guy. No need to take shots at everybody you didn’t like back then. You didn’t have to dig up all the bodies and shoot them dead again. You could have worn your magnanimit­y and come out sparkling and smelling better. But anyway, it’s your film. We just happened to be watching it. Sorry, but some of the aged bile was too hard to swallow. After a while, it started to feel like a series of rebukes. A great piece of filmmaking with a glaring personal agenda. Jordan was allowed to answer everyone whom he disagreed with, or who had anything unflatteri­ng to say. Perhaps the title of the series should have been “The Last Word.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines