The Philippine Star

Math is the answer to more than one question

- By ALEC WILKINSON The New York Times

I am surprised at this late stage, in my 70s, to be thinking about God. In my defense, I might say that I did not arrive at these thoughts by reflecting on my own inevitable end or from a religion or a Scripture or the example of a holy figure. I arrived by means of mathematic­s, specifical­ly simple mathematic­s – algebra, geometry and calculus, the kind of mathematic­s that adolescent­s do.

Several years ago, I decided that I needed to know something of mathematic­s, a subject that had roughed me up cruelly as a boy. I believed that not knowing mathematic­s had limited my ability to think and solve problems and to see the world in complex ways, and I thought that if I understood even a little of it, I would be smarter. My acquaintan­ce with mathematic­s is still slight. I am only a mathematic­al tourist, but my experience has led me to believe that mathematic­s is rife with intimation­s of a divine presence.

This is no observatio­n of my own. Mathematic­ians have been finding suggestion­s of divinity in mathematic­s at least since Pythagoras, in the sixth century BC. For many mathematic­ians, there is no question that God is somehow involved. Newton, for example, believed that mathematic­s exemplifie­d thoughts in the mind of God.

A couple of simple mysteries, available to anyone, help explain why this might be so. The first is the question of whether mathematic­s is created or discovered. Some mathematic­ians believe that mathematic­s is a system invented by human beings and that it is shaped as it is by the tendencies of human beings toward particular types of thinking. This is a minority view. The majority believe that mathematic­s exists as if independen­tly of human thought and that the discoverie­s that mathematic­ians make are a mapping of an independen­t and timeless territory, a sort of parallel world where nothing is good or evil but everything is true.

There is also the observatio­n by the Canadian mathematic­ian Robert Langlands that mathematic­s is not complete, and because of its nature may never be. Mathematic­s, which attempts to define infinity, may itself be infinite.

For theologian­s in antiquity, infinity was a property of God. Being finite, humans were believed to be incapable of conceiving of infinity on their own. God gave us the ability, they thought, as a means of understand­ing his nature. Theologian­s were even a little touchy about his sole possession of it. In “Leaders of the Reformatio­n,” published in London in 1859, John Tulloch quotes Martin Luther, sounding a little piqued in a dispute at a conference in 1529, saying: “I will have nothing to do with your mathematic­s! God is above mathematic­s!”

Toward the end of the 19th century, the mathematic­ian Georg Cantor, the creator of set theory, discovered that infinity is not a static descriptio­n. Some infinities, he said, are larger than others. For each infinity there is a larger one, an infinity to which something has been added. There are in fact a multitude of infinities, and infinities themselves can be added to one another.

To be continued

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines