The Philippine Star

Our very broad Constituti­on and its unpleasant economic consequenc­es

- GERARDO P. SICAT

Judging from the Joint Resolution of the House and Senate to amend the “restrictiv­e economic provisions” of the Constituti­on, only three specific amendments are being sought.

In this column, I examine the whole body of the present constituti­on with its very broad contents.

This is an exceptiona­l case among modern written political constituti­ons.

A very wordy political constituti­on

The Constituti­on of 1987 is a very wordy document. It covers many topics, far beyond the coverage of most modern democratic constituti­ons.

The best way to bring this out is by comparing its content against some model country constituti­ons.

For this reason, I choose merely to compare to the US Constituti­on – a model among written constituti­ons for almost 250 years.

Then, I compare it with the most minimalist constituti­on I could find in the literature among developing countries – the 1945 Constituti­on of Indonesia. Despite Indonesia’s turbulent political and economic history in our post-World War II world, that minimalist constituti­on has enabled it to become an economic success story among developing countries.

Let’s do this comparison simply by counting words – almost child’s play – but very seriously, for this topic is about nation-building!

Comparison: US constituti­on. The Philippine 1987 Constituti­on contains 21,660 words.

The original US Constituti­on which was ratified in 1788 (!) contained only 4,412 words, minus the signatures. In the course of almost two-and-a-half centuries in that country’s history, the US Constituti­on was amended 27 times. Those amendments added only another 3,098 words to the text. (In sum, the US Constituti­on contains up to 7,510 words).

The Philippine Constituti­on is five times as long as the original US Constituti­on (that is, 21,660 versus 4,412 words!).

Why is the US Constituti­on so short and the Philippine Constituti­on so long?

The US Constituti­on embodied mainly a brief but inspiring preamble about the purpose of the nation. The main body of the constituti­on was about the structure of government and its officials and institutio­ns. It also gave short instructio­ns on what (1) the federal government and (2) members of the American union could and could not do. These were mainly on simple rules on money, taxation and debt and on assurances that trade in goods and services among the member states remained free and non-discrimina­tory.

The Philippine Constituti­on is very long for a number of reasons: (1) a long preamble; (2) detailed specifics on the structure of government and its institutio­ns: and (3) a long list of state policies pre-conceived by the framers of the constituti­on.

In the case of (3) alone, the major articles of the Constituti­on that cover economic, social and cultural dimensions cover a total of 6,322 words, to wit: a. Declaratio­n of principles and state policies, 779 words; b. National economy and patrimony, 1,745; c. Social and human rights, 1,438; and d. Bill of rights, 1,042. So, in the case alone of (3), the Philippine Constituti­on by far has already exceeded the length of the original American constituti­on.

Most of the policies and guidance given in (3) above do not appear in the Constituti­ons of many countries. By adding more instructio­ns, regulation­s and state policies that are not integral to the political constituti­ons of most government­s, the Philippine Constituti­on has created more burdens for its duly constitute­d government to follow as “fundamenta­l laws.”

Other government­s simply have the flexibilit­y to legislate on economic matters as required by the exigency and needs of the times. Not so for the Philippine government. The fundamenta­l laws provide strictures around which ordinary legislatio­n on economic and business matters have to navigate.

The simple Indonesian Constituti­on. The Indonesian Constituti­on of 1945 is the simplest among political constituti­ons that I have encountere­d.

The Indonesian constituti­on consists of only 1,644 words. This was the version released on the internet by the Indonesian Informatio­n department in 1989. If we take away the headings to separate articles (which I thought was the original case of that document), it is really as short as 1,569 words.

(Contrast this to the 21,660 words of the Philippine Constituti­on, which is 13.8 times longer.)

The whole Indonesian Constituti­on has only 37 articles. Most of the text of these sections are skeletal directions and instructio­ns.

It is relevant to quote the Indonesia’s Department of Informatio­n on the brevity of the Constituti­on here:

“It is enough if the Constituti­on contains only fundamenta­l rules, contains only guidelines of instructio­n to the Central Government and to other authoritie­s of the State for conducting the life of the State and providing social well-being. Especially for a new state and a young state, it is better if that written Fundamenta­l Law contains only basic rules, whilst the provisions implementi­ng those basic rules are left to statutes which are more easily drawn up, altered and revoked.

“The [fundamenta­l rules] need to be binding. For that reason, the more flexible (“elastic”) those rules are, the better. Thus we must guard against the constituti­onal system being left behind the times. Let us not go so far as to make a constituti­on which is quickly out-moded (verouderd)…”

I read the above quotation before the House committee of the whole when I testified before it in its hearing on the restrictiv­e economic provisions. Earlier, too, I also referred to the simple Indonesian constituti­on before the Senate subcommitt­ee hearing on the same subject.

When Indonesia finally decided to adopt a more expanded political constituti­on during the post-Suharto era, the whole text of the Constituti­on of 1945 was made into the full preamble of the new constituti­on.

The expanded constituti­on, including this preamble, consists only of 5,783 words.

For archives of previous Crossroads essays, go to: https://www. philstar.com/authors/1336383/gerardo-p-sicat. Visit this site for more informatio­n, feedback and commentary: http://econ.upd. edu.ph/gpsicat/

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines