Arab News

On Washington investigat­ing Qatar

- ABDULRAHMA­N AL-RASHED

All countries involved must lay out their cards on the table and accept cooperatio­n instead of exchanging accusation­s.They must accept an investigat­ion and try those who are blackliste­d.

THE ongoing row between Qatar and a bloc including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain and Egypt is largely based on allegation­s of Doha’s backing of terror groups and rabble-rousers. The Saudi-led bloc issued a blacklist naming Qatari suspects and organizati­ons engaged in terror operations. Doha rejects the accusation­s, claiming the list is controvers­ial, politicize­d and reflects inter-state disputes.

However, blackliste­d Qatari parties are not just barred by the bloc, but are designated by official US institutio­ns such as the Department of the Treasury. The blacklist is becoming internatio­nal rather than exclusive to Arab states. Qatar is being urged to extradite all those on the blacklist residing on its territory.

But instead of discussing the names, a Qatari Foreign Ministry official took a hawkish position, claiming that the diplomatic crisis targets Doha’s reputation, and that the states joining the boycott have imposed self-proclaimed custody over Qatar. In order for the truth not to be lost amid the bloc’s claims and Qatar’s denials, the latter can involve the Americans, given that they are its friend and have informatio­n about the blacklist.

The matter concerns the internatio­nal community, not just the Saudis, Egyptians, Emiratis and Bahrainis. So it is an opportunit­y to cooperate and be transparen­t. All countries involved must lay out their cards on the table and accept cooperatio­n instead of exchanging accusation­s. They must accept an investigat­ion and try those who are blackliste­d. Doha’s problem is that those blackliste­d — including Saudis, Kuwaitis and others — are linked to it.

Even though Qataris are blackliste­d, Doha refuses to try them. This strengthen­s suspicions. Worse, most on the list are still active in Syria, Libya, Egypt, Iraq and other conflict zones where terrorist groups operate. The same goes for institutio­ns and associatio­ns that are considered bogus charities. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain and the UAE have made these institutio­ns’ names public.

“The list included the names of charity organizati­ons that have a long history in humanitari­an work. Some of them have a consultati­ve status at the UN,” the Qatari Foreign Ministry official said. So why does Qatar not silence its rivals by allowing an internatio­nal investigat­ion into these institutio­ns or shutting them down? Our brothers in Qatar, for their own sake and interest, must heed this advice.

Doha has befriended terrorist groups since the mid-1990s. First it publicized Al-Qaeda videos and propaganda in Afghanista­n, then Qatar’s activity expanded into areas where there are revolution­s, funding armed groups such as Al-Nusra Front and Ahrar Al-Sham.

Counterter­rorism ranks first on the world’s priority list. The internatio­nal community will pursue any country that supports these groups. It will not be long before Doha finds itself caught in the clamps of countries bigger than Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt and the UAE.

Abdulrahma­n Al-Rashed is a veteran columnist. He is the former general manager of Al Arabiya News Channel, and former editor-in-chief of Asharq Al-Awsat, where this article was originally published.

Q

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Saudi Arabia