Arab News

Putin’s weird war gets ever riskier

- PETER APPS

Despite signs that President Donald Trump would still like to be in Putin’s good graces, Congress and much of the US government simply will not let him — particular­ly as probes into Russian election hacking and the Trump campaign’s Moscow links gather steam.

SEPTEMBER will be a nervous month in Eastern Europe. On Sept. 14, Russia will unleash what may be its largest military exercise since the Cold War. In Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and elsewhere, officials are openly concerned that the “Zapad (‘West’) 2017” drills near their borders will be used as cover for a military attack.

Russian President Vladimir Putin sees both convention­al and nuclear posturing as a useful tool to reassert Moscow’s status as a world power and intimidate nearby enemies. The three years since Russia’s annexation of Crimea have seen a dramatic increase in Moscow’s military activity.

But Russia’s escalating confrontat­ion with the West goes well beyond that. Moscow, Washington and other Western government­s understand that any direct conflict between Russia and the West would prove disastrous. Instead, the face-off is worsening in wider, often weirder ways. And while many Americans would blame Moscow, many Russians see it differentl­y.

Part of that is down to a Kremlin media machine that relentless­ly pushes the message that Moscow must assert itself to avoid being surrounded and impoverish­ed — and paints the West as chaotic, corrupt and Machiavell­ian. Such views are deeply embedded in Russia’s national mindset. An unclassifi­ed report released by the US Defense Intelligen­ce Agency in June concluded that senior Russian leaders genuinely believed Washington was intent on toppling them, particular­ly under President Barack Obama.

That belief creates mounting dangers that damage and destabiliz­e both sides — and that show no signs of subsiding.

Despite signs that President Donald Trump would still like to be in Putin’s good graces, Congress and much of the US government simply will not let him — particular­ly as probes into Russian election hacking and the Trump campaign’s Moscow links gather steam. With a continuous drip feed of allegation­s and revelation­s, it will become ever more toxic to relations.

On Aug. 2, Trump bowed to bipartisan pressure in signing a bill to impose new sanctions demanded by Congress. It was a sign of just how Capitol Hill, not the president, now may be calling the shots — Trump complained on Twitter that the sanctions might dangerousl­y imperil relations with Russia, but he was politicall­y unable to block them.

At the end of the Cold War, Western leaders took the deliberate decision to pull Moscow into the West’s economic structures to cement peace. The latest round of sanctions may be the final nail in the coffin of that approach. Writing on his Facebook page, Russian Prime Minister Dmitri Medvedev described them as “economic war,” saying they ended any hopes for a rapprochem­ent under the Trump administra­tion.

Even as the proxy war Washington and Russia have been waging in Syria appears to be tailing off, the one in Ukraine appears intensifyi­ng. Last week, US Defense Secretary James Mattis announced the government is considerin­g supplying lethal weaponry to Ukraine — primarily US-made antitank rockets — to be used in its ongoing war with Moscow-backed Russian-speaking separatist­s.

Meanwhile, Moscow is inserting itself more deeply into Washington’s confrontat­ion with North Korea. Last week, nuclear-capable Russian bombers probed Japanese and South Korean airspace. Moscow is encouragin­g Russian tourism to North Korea, inevitably complicati­ng any US decision to conduct military action on the peninsula.

Russia’s suspected interferen­ce in Western politics now goes well beyond intermitte­nt hacking and the release of potentiall­y sensitive informatio­n seen in the American, French and other elections. Social media experts say an army of suspected Russianrun Twitter feeds and other web and social media outlets are now also energetica­lly pushing their own disruptive narratives into American and European political discourse.

Suspected Russian-linked “bots” — believed to be largely automated Twitter feeds — were observed spreading far-right messaging both before and after the white supremacis­t demonstrat­ions in Charlottes­ville, Virginia. They are also accused of spreading rumors and criticism of US National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster during his reported face-off with now-ousted Trump strategist Steve Bannon.

Similar tactics — utilizing not just social media but Moscow’s mainstream foreign-facing platforms such as the Russia Today TV station and Sputnik website — are aimed at Europe, sometimes even more intently. On Aug. 6, McMaster accused Moscow, and Putin in particular, of trying to “break apart Europe” with propaganda and disinforma­tion. “The nature of the regime is one person,” he said in reference to the Russian president.

That is a direct contrast to the early years of the Obama presidency, when that administra­tion hoped to sideline Putin by working primarily with then-president Medvedev. That — along with perceived Western support for opposition and human rights groups within Russia — appeared to further feed paranoia in the Kremlin, particular­ly after unusually large anti-Putin street protests in 2011.

For now, all sides still clearly prefer to confront each other with economic, political and other unorthodox tactics rather than open force. The upcoming Zapad exercise, however, will probably follow what is now the traditiona­l Russian pattern of ending with a simulated nuclear strike on an enemy city or military force. The last Zapad exercise in 2013 had Warsaw as the simulated target, Western officials say, with other drills targeting Sweden as well as an offshore NATO flotilla. It is Moscow’s way of reminding its neighbors and potential adversarie­s of just what is at stake if tensions rise too high. The irony is that it will simply guarantee that a nervous world could get even more so.

QPeter Apps is Reuters, global affairs columnist. The opinions expressed here are his own.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Saudi Arabia