Arab News

Iran regime uses iron fist in times of stress

- DR. MAJID RAFIZADEH Twitter: @Dr_Rafizadeh

There appears to be a correlatio­n between Iran’s increasing military adventuris­m in the region and the regime’s deployment of brute force inside the country that is aimed at suppressin­g its population and any political opposition. The more the theocratic establishm­ent becomes belligeren­t in the Middle East, the more it becomes oppressive domestical­ly. According to a report published by Amnesty Internatio­nal last week, the Iranian regime’s human rights violations have drasticall­y increased in recent months. Various state institutio­ns, including the judiciary, law enforcemen­t and the Ministry of Intelligen­ce, are likely involved in such abuses and crimes. As the Amnesty report pointed out: “Iran’s police, intelligen­ce and security forces, and prison officials have committed, with the complicity of judges and prosecutor­s, a catalogue of shocking human rights violations, including arbitrary detention, enforced disappeara­nce, torture and other ill-treatment against those detained.” The victims reportedly include children as young as 10.

Many of those detained are people who oppose the regime and who participat­ed in the nationwide protests of November last year, which occurred following a spike in gas prices. These demonstrat­ions gave rise to some slogans that advocated regime change. The Iranian leaders have attempted to conceal the fact that the regime’s forces have resorted to violent methods of suppressin­g protests, but the regime continues to systematic­ally target those who take part in demonstrat­ions. For instance, only last week, the Supreme Court handed two death sentences to wrestling champion Navid Afkari, along with six years and six months in prison and 74 lashes, for participat­ing in the protests, according to Persian-language news broadcaste­r Iran Internatio­nal. His two brothers were also arrested: Vahid Afkari was sentenced to 54 years in jail, while

Habib Afkari received 27 years and 74 lashes. The regime is attempting to impose fear in the society and send a message to the Iranian population that the consequenc­es of any opposition to the government are extremely dire.

It is at the discretion of the judiciary or the Islamic Revolution­ary Court that many people are arrested on ambiguous charges, such as “spreading moharebeh (corruption on Earth),” “waging war against God,” or endangerin­g the country’s national security. Lack of due process, forced confession­s and physical or psychologi­cal torture are prominent in the process through which the judiciary sentences defendants to death.

Due to the increasing disaffecte­dness of the public with the regime, the Iranian government has also been resorting to other suppressiv­e tactics, such as censorship of the media, restrictio­ns on journalist­s, arbitrary arrests, inhumane punishment­s, the jamming of foreign satellite television channels, and the detention of human rights defenders and minority rights groups. In addition, in order to impose fear, the regime uses egregious methods of torture as punishment. According to the new Amnesty Internatio­nal report, victims are frequently “hooded or blindfolde­d; punched, kicked and flogged; beaten with sticks, rubber hosepipes, knives, batons and cables; suspended or forced into holding painful stress positions for prolonged periods; deprived of sufficient food and potable water; placed in prolonged solitary confinemen­t, sometimes for weeks or even months; and denied medical care for injuries sustained during the protests or as a result of torture.”

Whenever the regime faces economic and geopolitic­al pressure regionally and globally, it tends to become more violent at home as a result. For instance, in 1988, after almost eight years of devastatin­g war with Iraq, and as the regime was facing organized opposition, the hold on power of the ruling mullahs was in danger. That’s when — in what became known as the 1988 massacre — the Iranian regime began cleansing its prisons of thousands of dissidents and opposition activists. Ultimately, an estimated 30,000 people lost their lives in the brutal massacre. Many of the perpetrato­rs continue to serve in senior positions, including former presidenti­al candidate and current Chief Justice Ebrahim Raisi, who was the prosecutor general of Tehran in 1988.

But it is important to point out that brutal repression is something that Iranian human rights and political activists can be expected to push back against with extraordin­ary resilience. This became clear during previous nationwide demonstrat­ions and uprisings, when many peaceful protesters were killed, either by Islamic Revolution­ary Guard Corps gunfire or by torturous interrogat­ions following their arrest. Opposition to the regime has not died down. It seems that unrest has effectivel­y become the status quo in Iranian society, albeit to varying degrees. But the Iranian authoritie­s are desperate to conceal this fact, so they silence anyone who dares to stand against the ruling clerics in order to project an image of strength . Unfortunat­ely, the Iranian leaders have never been held accountabl­e for their crimes and human rights violations. It is incumbent on the UN to take this issue seriously and act accordingl­y.

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated Iranian-American political scientist.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Saudi Arabia