Hyundai Kona is hip but pricey
ROAD TEST/ Bold looks and good specification characterise this Korean small crossover, but money talks, writes Phuti Mpyane
First up, Hyundai looks to be winning the grille wars of the lower segments. The company’s latest interpretation is by far the best since the Korean car maker’s inception. It’s Audi-esque, yet not quite, Lexus-like, but not as bold. The Kona’s gaping maw is particularly eye-catching and theatrical, more so thanks to this small crossover’s dramatically divergent looks, with its thin letterbox-type headlights.
In all fairness, anyone who finds the Kona quirky shouldn’t be censored. The frontal styling and acres of dark-patch mudguards precede the outlook of a Hyundai crossover not aimed at everyone. Conservative tastes will be better served by the more mainstream-looking and R30,000 cheaper Hyundai Creta or the R34,000 dearer Hyundai Tucson. But for those who like their motoring oddities, the Kona continues along the same Hyundai path of practicality, packed-in features, performance and economy.
The Kona is 11cm shorter and 7cm lower than a Creta. But because the hipster Kona is shapelier, it only has 371l of boot space compared to 475l in mom’s Creta. Interior styling is altered in the Kona it’s fun yet minimalist, accented in lime, and features a dominating cylindrical-shaped section that houses the air-conditioning vents below a floating command screen. From a features perspective, our test Kona had the basics, plus more, covered. Full electric windows, remote central locking, enough climate control, a pair of USB ports and a not-so-premium sound system ticked the boxes (see full list in Tech Specs).
It’s available in two engine choices, a 2.0 MPI petrol fourcylinder or 1.0T TGDI. Drive is exclusively sent to the front wheels in either guise and our test TGDI was fitted with a sixspeed manual transmission, which unfortunately for haters of gridlocked traffic is the exclusive fitment for this smallcapacity engine.
You’ll either love or loathe the distinctively coarse thrum of a three-cylinder, but nonetheless the downsized turbo engine is peppy and impressive for a first stab at the genre. It delivers its 85kW and 175Nm with reasonable verve and is able to dispatch overtaking manoeuvres fairly decisively. It’s only 8Nm down on torque than the larger four-cylinder variant.
Hyundai claims a thrifty 6.8l/100km, but the best fuel consumption I managed was 7.0l/100km, helped along by a rare midweek cruise down the N3 south during the test period. In typical traffic conditions it shot up to 7.6l/100km.
It’s also a pretty decent ride. The typically light and easy responses expected from Hyundai are all there. Steering it in city conditions is effortless and actually masks its real size. Though it’s no Lexus, the damping absorbs a lot of road ugliness well and rattles and squeaks were noticeably absent.