Business Day

Alliance liquidator­s ordered to hand over inquiry papers

- PHAKAMISA NDZAMELA Finance Writer ndzamelap@bdfm.co.za

LIQUIDATOR­S of failed Alliance Mining have been ordered by the High Court in Johannesbu­rg to hand over transcript­s relating to an inquiry into the collapse of the company.

The judgment has consequenc­es for other companies seeking to hide informatio­n as this could now be difficult.

Alliance Mining, an erstwhile JSElisted technical solutions provider to the mining industry, went into liquidatio­n in 2010 after the state-owned Industrial Developmen­t Corporatio­n advanced R114m to the company in 2009 for an empowermen­t deal. The company’s collapse was shrouded in secrecy, with its liquidator­s refusing to issue informatio­n on why it failed.

Stuart Theobald, a Business Day columnist and BDFM publishers made an applicatio­n under the Promotion of Access to Informatio­n Act in 2013, asking the court to compel the liquidator­s to provide access to two sets of documents with details of shenanigan­s in the company.

The documents related to a report by profession­al services firm Grant Thornton, commission­ed to find out what happened to Alliance Mining. The liquidator­s — Norman Klein, Juanito Damons, Christophe­r Monyela and Osman Moosa — had also been granted the right to convene an inquiry under section 417 of the Companies Act to investigat­e Alliance Mining’s affairs. The inquiry is still under way.

After resisting for some years, the liquidator­s told the High Court in Johannesbu­rg at the beginning of this month that they would not oppose the disclosure of the Grant Thornton report. However, they argued against their disclosure of the section 417 inquiry records.

Judge Kathleen Satchwell ruled the liquidator­s liable for the legal costs that arose from their opposition to issuing the Grant Thornton report.

The report, which Business Day has seen, shows that directors at Alliance Mining intentiona­lly manipulate­d the financial statements of the company including the valuation of assets and the creation of fictitious loan accounts, in the two years before its collapse.

The company issued and acquired shares illegally to place them on a contract for difference platform that generated millions of rand in cash, which then disappeare­d.

In effect, Nedbank used the shares as security to provide finance through its Ned-Trade platform.

On the section 417 inquiry, Judge Satchwell ordered last week that the liquidator­s “are to provide all of the informatio­n and records sought in applicants’ request for access to informatio­n .... within five court days”.

Initially, the liquidator­s had argued the request for informatio­n was too vague and disclosure might constitute an action for breach of confidence. They further argued that section 417 (7) of the Companies Act provided for such an inquiry to be private and confidenti­al and that third parties had not consented to disclosure. The liquidator­s also contended that Business Day had asked for the inquiry records from the wrong people, as it was run by a commission­er, not the liquidator­s.

There was also an argument that disclosure of the informatio­n from the inquiry can “reasonably be expected to threaten the recoverabi­lity of the property of the company”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa