Business Day

Trump’s sins more like stained blue dress

- SIMON BARBER Barber is a freelance journalist based in Washington.

Is Kremlingat­e a lethal cancer on the Trump presidency, the way the Watergate cover-up was for Richard Nixon? Or is it more akin to Whitewater, the pseudo-scandal named after a failed property developmen­t that blighted, but did not destroy, Bill and Hillary Clinton’s tenancy of the White House.

Just as many Democrats question Donald Trump’s legitimacy today, so many Republican­s rejected Clinton’s in 1992. They went hunting for skeletons Billary left behind when they came to Washington from Little Rock, Arkansas, where Bill had been governor and which was by no means the ethics capital of the US.

Smelling smoke from the Whitewater deal and other Clinton schemes to improve their then scant net worth, the haters blew as hard as they could to coax up a flame. Vince Foster, a friend and law partner of the Clintons, committed suicide under circumstan­ces readily construabl­e as mysterious, and, voila, you had the makings of an inferno.

Then, as now, there were plenty of fake news artists at the ready with phony inflammabl­es. Before long, journals such as the American Spectator, with funding from well-heeled right-wingers, were spinning ripping yarns. One set had governor Clinton running drugs and guns from a clandestin­e airbase called Mena.

Special prosecutor, Senate hearings and all the other trappings of a really good Washington-gate followed. But the Clinton funeral pyre refused to light, at least while built on Whitewater. Then the Big Dog torched himself by “not having sex with that woman”, the intern Monica Lewinsky, which got him impeached for lying under oath. He survived, nonetheles­s, and would be remembered as one of the better ones.

I am beginning to think Kremlingat­e may turn out to be a squib as damp as Whitewater would have been without the stained blue dress to keep Republican hopes alive. For the Federal Bureau of Investigat­ion to be officially investigat­ing whether a sitting president and/or members of his entourage colluded with an unfriendly foreign power to secure his election is without precedent. Only Nixon’s intrigues to derail Lyndon Johnson’s 1968 Vietnam peace efforts come close, and they involved collusion with friend rather than foe.

However, as much of a first as the current investigat­ion may be, there is as yet nothing that points to any kind of active or conscious conspiracy between Trump and the Russian government to nobble the election.

The US intelligen­ce community is on record as having a high level of confidence that the Kremlin was involved in hacking and leaking internal Democratic Party communicat­ions in a manner calculated to prejudice the chances of nominee Clinton.

Beyond that, there are plenty of dots but no firm connection between them.

We know Team Trump at one point included the swamp creature of all Washington swamp creatures, Paul Manafort, and the weird one-time Robin to Manafort’s Batman, Roger Stone. Manafort, according to documents obtained by the Associated Press, had a $10m-a-year contract to influence US policy financed by an oligarch close to Vladimir Putin. Stone, who cut his incisors as a political dirty trickster for Nixon, bragged about knowing in advance what hacked documents were going to strike the Clinton campaign next.

But this also needs to be remembered: when Manafort’s work for Putin’s gauleiter in Ukraine became known last August, Trump dumped him as campaign chairman. As for Stone, best one can tell he’s a legend in his own mind, not Trump’s.

So where does that leave us? I’m inclined for now to go with the judgment of Mark Cuban, a real self-made billionair­e. Cuban knows Trump. They talk. There was even thought of him as Trump’s running mate. On Saturday, he delivered, in a stream of tweets, his verdict on Trump and Russia.

Trump’s abiding focus, he said, was his wallet, which was under growing stress. “Businesses from Trump steaks to Trump U[niversity] were awful. His kids probably saved his net worth. What he did care about was his cash. He spent almost all of it in his campaign.”

Russians were willing to buy his condos, invest in his branded buildings and host his Miss Universe beauty pageant. So, “he spoke favourably about Putin to get $ out of Russia and into Trump deals”.

Putin “recognised Trump’s greed and took advantage by back channellin­g co-ordinated misinforma­tion in an attempt to influence voters”. Trump didn’t care much, one way or the other. “I talked to him … [and] people close to him during the campaign. He never thought he would win.”

WE KNOW TEAM TRUMP AT ONE POINT INCLUDED THE SWAMP CREATURE OF ALL WASHINGTON SWAMP CREATURES, PAUL MANAFORT

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa