Business Day

State on the wrong track

-

Your front page report (Calls for action over failure to transform, May 10) reveals the depth of the madness that has attached itself to the government’s approach to economic empowermen­t. Almost 200 companies have been “referred for prosecutio­n” for failing to meet racial targets set by the government.

Your report calls for “harsh penalties”. Firms are referred to as “offenders”. Calls are made to delist “noncomplia­nt” companies from the stock exchange. Employers that don’t meet racial quotas are referred to as “intransige­nt”.

But these “intransige­nt, noncomplia­nt offenders” are the only hope SA has of pulling out of the economic slump the country finds itself in. Against the odds, and in the face of policy hostility, many of these companies are doing everything they can to make a go of it in a now almost zero-growth economy.

We brief many companies and every week see company boards whose efforts to make a contributi­on to the country can only be described as heroic. These companies, and the boards that run them, are in our experience often dedicated, patriotic South Africans and foreign investors who are deeply committed to improving social and economic circumstan­ces in the country. But the way SA conceives of empowermen­t has brought us to a point where the government and many activists treat those same companies and their directors as virtual criminals.

In your report the ANC in effect blames them for “instabilit­y” in SA. What is going on here is not the pursuit of empowermen­t — it is the very antithesis of any definition of the word. Real empowermen­t requires more jobs, more entreprene­urs and the tax revenues to develop the infrastruc­ture to support economic expansion. Our polling shows time and again that South Africans do not care greatly for racial quotas and targets — the demand is for jobs, rising incomes and better lives.

The madness has reached a point where the government is engaged in an assault on the source of those jobs, yet claims time and again, and with the economy on its knees, that this assault is in pursuit of empowering SA’s people.

The country needs empowermen­t policies that work — there is no greater policy priority. But that won’t happen without recognitio­n that investment-led economic growth is the basis of all empowermen­t. Empowermen­t policy should be geared to reward the fixed investment, job creation, tax payment and export contributi­ons of companies.

My policy colleagues have devised a bold new approach to empowermen­t policy called economic empowermen­t for the disadvanta­ged (EED) that prioritise­s above all else the inputs necessary to position SA as a competitiv­e, high-growth emerging market. It is a workable alternativ­e for pulling millions of people into the middle classes. Under current empowermen­t policy, business, entreprene­urs and the private sector will continue to be hung out as a root cause of poverty, inequality and instabilit­y in SA. As the pursuit of “empowermen­t” drives more investors out of the country, the screws will be tightened on those that remain. Year after year, the rhetoric and hostility will deepen.

However, there are alternativ­e approaches to empowermen­t policy that could change that and organised business needs to learn to back those alternativ­es.

Frans Cronje

CEO, Institute of Race Relations

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa