Business Day

Tax pain for some directors

• Nonexecuti­ves will have to register for VAT from start of June as new regulation­s classifyin­g them as independen­t contractor­s kick in

- Maarten Mittner Markets Writer mittnerm@fm.co.za

Nonexecuti­ve directors could face onerous obligation­s after the South African Revenue Service ruling that they needed to register for value-added tax before June 1, some analysts said.

Nonexecuti­ve directors could face onerous obligation­s after the South African Revenue Service (SARS) ruling that they need to register for value-added tax (VAT) before June 1 2017, some analysts say.

There are 2,248 nonexecuti­ve directors in SA, most of whom earn more than the annual R1m threshold for registrati­on of an enterprise under the VAT Act.

“Many may decide it is not worth their while to serve,” said PwC VAT partner Charles de Wet. He described the new regulation­s as problemati­c. “It is quite a process to register for VAT and will place extensive and continuing administra­tive rules and regulation­s on nonexecuti­ve directors,” said De Wet.

This includes paying over VAT every two months and keeping records of all costs that may be deducted as input VAT from output payments.

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr VAT specialist Jerome Brink said SARS had clarified the status of nonexecuti­ve directors as “independen­t contractor­s”. All would be required to register for VAT.

“However, nonexecuti­ve directors do not have to account for VAT in respect of directors’ fees received before June 1, provided they were subjected to employees tax.”

The ruling, issued on May 5, ends a protracted dispute in which nonexecuti­ves argued they were not common law employees but received “remunerati­on” — directors fees and services — that entitled them to pay employees tax, commonly known as PAYE.

VAT legislatio­n excludes employees from the crucial definition of “enterprise”, whereby employees fall outside the VAT ambit. However, the VAT Act does include the activities of “independen­t contractor­s”.

SARS has ruled that a nonexecuti­ve director is not a common law employee and does not receive remunerati­on.

This relies on the definition­s in the King 3 report, which states that a nonexecuti­ve director provides “objective judgment independen­t of the management of a company”.

SARS says in its ruling that if a nonexecuti­ve director is not deemed to be an employee and is not a common law employee, the amounts payable will not be remunerati­on and are not subject to the deduction of employees tax.

De Wet said SARS followed a hard line on the issue, creating a lot of unnecessar­y “noise”.

“There could have been more consultati­on on a simplified registrati­on process, for example.”

He said there was a view that the PAYE system worked well for nonexecuti­ves and there was no clear need to change it. Now nonexecuti­ves would have to add a 14% cost to their services.

The South African Reward Associatio­n welcomed the ruling, saying nonexecuti­ve directors would not be subject to withholdin­g taxes and would be allowed to deduct expenses incurred in the production of income. The reasoning was in line with King 3 and 4 codes.

However, De Wet questioned the benefits. “The eventual deductions allowed may be quite small, such as relating to computer usage,” he said.

SARS stood to gain more in VAT collection­s than it probably got on PAYE, he said.

VAT tax practition­ers stood to gain because SARS’s previous requiremen­ts from nonexecuti­ves were mostly limited to filling out an IRP5, said De Wet.

 ??  ?? Charles de Wet
Charles de Wet

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa