Business Day

Cosatu pension battle rages on

• Postponeme­nt of decision to alter provident fund rules generates anger as talks drag on without agreement

- Theto Mahlakoana Political Writer mahlakoana­t@businessli­ve.co.za

Cosatu said that it would keep fighting any amendments to the provident fund rules until government had a sustainabl­e social security plan in place.

Cosatu says it will keep fighting any amendments to the provident fund rules until the government has a sustainabl­e social security plan in place.

The labour federation was reacting to the Treasury’s proposal that the implementa­tion of the contentiou­s changes to provident funds be postponed by another year until 2019.

The changes are contained in the new draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill published for public comment.

The amendments, first proposed in 2015, seek to transform provident funds into schemes such as pensions and retirement annuity funds.

To do this, the Treasury wanted provident fund members, upon retirement, to be entitled to withdraw only a third of their benefits as a lump sum, and wanted to annuitise at least two-thirds.

Cosatu threatened to strike over the changes, saying the government had no right to compel workers to annuitise their savings, especially without proper consultati­on with labour and other partners.

The uproar has forced the Treasury to postpone the implementa­tion of the amendments to 2018.

“The postponeme­nt was done in order to provide sufficient time for the minister of finance to consult with interested parties, including the National Economic Developmen­t and Labour Council [Nedlac], regarding the annuitisat­ion requiremen­ts for provident funds after the publicatio­n of the comprehens­ive policy document on social security, and to report back to Parliament on the outcome of those consultati­ons no later than August 31 2017,” said an explanator­y memo.

However, whether the government would meet the 2019 deadline depends on how fast a comprehens­ive social security plan is tabled.

Labour federation­s have expressed displeasur­e at the pace of the talks at Nedlac, which are meant to help formulate the plans.

The government has been promising to deliver the comprehens­ive paper for more than a decade, with some analysts suggesting the funding model for such a social security plan was the stumbling block.

Cosatu parliament­ary coordinato­r Matthew Parks confirmed that talks at Nedlac were at an early stage.

“Engagement­s at Nedlac are still in the early stages. But we are convinced that we can find each other on a sustainabl­e comprehens­ive social security plan that will cover all South Africans,” Parks said.

He said that Cosatu would not agree to any changes blocking workers from accessing their provident funds during their time of need, emergency or unemployme­nt.

“These are workers’ hardearned and deferred wages,” Parks said.

The government is in the meantime continuing to grapple with a huge social grants bill that includes welfare provision to pensioners over the age of 60.

According to the South African Social Security Agency, more than 3.3-million people were receiving old-age grants as of April 2017.

CHANGES BLOCK WORKERS FROM THEIR PROVIDENT FUNDS, THEIR HARDEARNED WAGES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa