Business Day

Are SA’s asset managers starting to find their activist voice?

-

Aggressive activism — outside of politics — isn’t a popular pastime in SA. We’re more likely to gripe than gun for wayward executives. Which is why the overhaul of Group Five’s board is a big deal. Business Day spoke to the retail investor’s corporate crusader, Theo Botha.

Do you think asset managers are actually more activist than we give them credit for?

I wouldn’t say they’re activist, but there are companies that have set up a communicat­ion channel where substantia­l shareholde­rs can engage with them. In those meetings [investors] can discuss what they really want to discuss and they can say, “Hey, I don’t think the governance is good”.

But those meetings should be documented. They could be discussing issues which have a fundamenta­l effect on the company’s future income.

In a way, those asset owners and asset managers get an inside track, don’t they? Often I sit in meetings and they’ll say, “Well, off the record,” and release the informatio­n. In so doing, they make you part of an inside club.

So how do you resolve those issues?

Well, you can take minutes of the meeting and release those to shareholde­rs.

Is the Promotion of Access to Informatio­n Act (PAIA) helpful for shareholde­rs if they feel they’re being stonewalle­d by a company?

First of all, I hate using PAIA because when I ask for something, whatever I request is reasonable — I don’t go out of my way to ask for something I shouldn’t have.

So, for example with Coronation — they didn’t put forward their remunerati­on policy to shareholde­rs, so I just asked for it. And they refused to give it. So then I handed over the PAIA at the AGM [annual general meeting]. It’s an embarrassm­ent to the company, that’s what I’d say. And at Naspers, I specifical­ly asked for the remunerati­on policy and they refused to give it to me because I’d bought my shares a couple of weeks after the AGM and they felt that only shareholde­rs before the AGM were entitled to it.

I think it’s a total embarrassm­ent for [Naspers CEO] Koos Bekker and it’s a sad reflection on how that company runs its business. As soon as he got the PAIA, we got the remunerati­on policy.

Do SA’s company laws and JSE listings requiremen­ts give shareholde­rs enough protection, in your view?

I think we’re weak on class action. We don’t see class action as you would in America or Europe. I think that’s a problem. I don’t think we have protection of minority shareholde­rs when they lose money. We just don’t hear of that in SA.

Should there have been a class action against MTN when they lost all that money in Nigeria?

Flip, there should definitely have been because there was an issue — a director didn’t do what should have been done and it cost the company and shareholde­rs money.

In America, you can get [a hostile shareholde­r] from a guy who only owns 5% — and they can drive a point. Here a guy owns 5% and the company will laugh at you.

Having said all this, are asset managers becoming more vocal?

We are starting to see some asset managers starting to vote against remunerati­on policies and not just ticking the boxes. My problem with the PIC [the Public Investment Corporatio­n, the JSE’s biggest shareholde­r] is I don’t think they’re properly resourced to do what they need to do.

If [asset managers] don’t perform, then the money is out the door. So, it’s a bit like two to three years ago, RECM didn’t perform and suddenly money was being withdrawn from their fund. Therefore, they’re under pressure.

You have to have a balance between looking at your investment over a long-term basis and looking at it from a governance perspectiv­e.

Do they have the right compositio­n of board members and do they have the right skills set? Or are they just there because they knew somebody on another board they sit on? Shareholde­rs should be asking themselves: how did this guy get here? People say we don’t have enough executive directors, we don’t have enough nonexecuti­ve directors — but we have a lot of nonexecuti­ve directors who don’t get the opportunit­y to sit on boards because people are comfortabl­e with who they know.

Can shareholde­r activism be a bad thing?

When Allan Gray came in on Johnnic [a previous incarnatio­n of Business Day owner Tiso Blackstar] and said we want you to sell DStv? I was so against that.

Shareholde­rs came together, not for the greater good of the company. They put two directors on the board and forced it to sell [an asset].

 ??  ?? GIULIETTA TALEVI
GIULIETTA TALEVI

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa