Business Day

Six investment options that may tempt you in low-return markets

• It would be folly to expect to earn traditiona­l returns from investing in the traditiona­l way

- Michel Pireu (pireum@streetdogs.co.za)

In September’s memo, Oaktree Capital’s Howard Marks tackles the fact that his prior memo, There They Go Again … Again, of July 26, “generated the most response” in the 28 years he’s been writing memos and a lot of questions in one form or another of, “So what should I do?”.

“In the low-return world I described in the memo,” says Marks, “the options are limited: 1 Invest as you always have and expect your historic returns. 2 Invest as you always have and settle for today’s low returns. 3 Reduce risk to prepare for a correction and accept still lower returns. 4 Go to cash at a nearzero return and wait for a better environmen­t. 5 Increase risk in pursuit of higher returns. 6 Put more into special niches and special investment managers.

“It would be sheer folly to expect to earn traditiona­l returns today from investing like you’ve done traditiona­lly (#1). With the risk-free rate of interest near zero and the returns on all other investment­s scaled based on that … few if any asset classes will return in the next few years what they’ve delivered historical­ly. Thus, one of the sensible courses of action is to invest as you did in the past but accept that returns will be lower (#2).

“Sensible, but not highly satisfacto­ry … No one wants to make less than they used to. If you believe [risk is high] today, you might want to opt for #3. If you think a correction is coming, reducing your risk makes sense. But what if it takes years to be proved right? Going to cash (#4) is the extreme example of risk reduction. Are you willing to accept a return of zero as the price for being assured of avoiding a possible correction? Most investors can’t or won’t voluntaril­y sign on for zero returns. All the above leads to #5: increasing risk as the way to earn high returns in a low-return world.

“But high risk does not assure higher returns. It means accepting greater uncertaint­y with the goal of higher returns and the possibilit­y of substantia­lly lower (or negative) returns .... it should be done with great care, if at all.

“And that leaves #6. Special niches and special people … can deliver higher returns without proportion­ally more risk…. But it’s not easy [and] has to be based on the belief that … there are inefficien­t markets and … you … have the exceptiona­l skill needed to exploit them.”

Marks says none of these possibilit­ies is attractive or a sure thing, “but there are no others”. So, what would he do?

“For me the answer lies in a combinatio­n of numbers 2, 3 and 6,” he says. “Expecting normal returns from normal activities (#1) is out in my book, as are settling for zero in cash (#4) and ramping up risk in the hope of draws from the favourable part of the probabilit­y distributi­on (#5). Thus I would mostly do the things I always have done and accept that returns will be lower than they traditiona­lly have been (#2). While doing the usual, I would increase the caution with which I do it (#3), even at the cost of a reduction in expected return. And I would emphasise ‘alpha markets’ where hard work and skill might add to returns (#6), since there are no ‘beta markets’ that offer generous returns today.”

Ben Carlson agrees with Marks that 2, 3 and 6 are the best options and looks at the pros and cons for each.

“Given current valuation and interest rate levels,” says Carlson, “it makes sense that market returns should be lower going forward. Doing nothing is a decision. The simplest option for most investors is to stick with their long-term investment plans and adjust their expectatio­ns. As long as you can keep your costs and expectatio­ns in check, there’s no reason sticking with a well-thought-out strategy shouldn’t continue to work.

“[Unfortunat­ely] if markets are unable to do the heavy lifting, investors are going to have to pick up the slack to earn their fair share of market returns.

“Lower market returns likely mean people should save more, make more, work longer, spend less or adjust their lifestyle in retirement.

“Reducing risk enables you to take advantage of future opportunit­ies. The hope is that you can put more money to work at lower valuations or higher yields if and when things eventually go wrong. Cash is an option.

“On the downside, you could be waiting a long time to put your money back to work, so extreme patience is required. Timing the market is also a gateway investment to a cash addiction. There are always good reasons to wait for another buying opportunit­y.

“When stocks go up, you tell yourself you’ll wait for a correction, and when a correction comes, you tell yourself you’ll wait until they drop just a little further. There are no all-clears when things are going down, so you must incorporat­e rules to guide your actions.

“Going to cash also means you have to be right twice — once when you get out and again when you get back in.

“Niche investment­s and specialise­d investment managers can offer uncorrelat­ed return streams, provide downside protection or take an opportunis­tic approach to the markets.

“Risk-adjusted outperform­ance through a unique manager or strategy can add value as a return enhancer or portfolio diversifie­r. [However] it’s tough to find consistent sources of alpha in the markets because of increased competitio­n, high costs and lack of access to the best money managers. Marks is one of the greatest investors of all time, but it’s nearly impossible for most of the investing public to invest in his funds as they are reserved mostly for large institutio­nal investors.”

If diversific­ation is a form of regret minimisati­on, diversific­ation by strategy is an intelligen­t way to minimise the probabilit­y of making the wrong choice.

And, even if Marks’s market uncertaint­ies turn out not to be as unusual “in terms of number, scale and insolubili­ty” as he supposes, what’s the worst that can happen should you refuse to fall into line in carefree markets like today’s?

“It’s likely, that, for a while, you’ll … lag in terms of return and … look like an old fogey,” says Marks. “But neither of those is much of a price to pay if it means keeping your head (and capital) when others eventually lose theirs.”

THE HOPE IS YOU CAN PUT MORE MONEY TO WORK AT LOWER VALUATIONS OR HIGHER YIELDS IF … THINGS … GO WRONG

 ?? /Bloomberg ?? Insight: Oaktree Capital co-founder Howard Marks speaks during a Bloomberg Television interview in New York in April.
/Bloomberg Insight: Oaktree Capital co-founder Howard Marks speaks during a Bloomberg Television interview in New York in April.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa