Business Day

SAA in row over Brazilian ruling

- Neels Blom Writer at Large blomn@bdlive.co.za

South African Airways is embroiled in litigation that has brought the state-owned airline up against Brazilian law, following the carrier’s appeal against a finding by a labour court in Brazil.

South African Airways (SAA) is embroiled in litigation that has brought the state-owned airline up against Brazilian law, following the carrier’s appeal against a finding by a labour court in the South American country.

The court ruling stems from the unfair dismissal of SAA’s South American head, Nelson de Oliveira, whom the airline accused of poor management and neglect involving inconsiste­ncies and incongruen­cies in handling lost-baggage claims.

The litigation stems from action taken by SAA against De Oliviera after SAA Brazil had paid compensati­on of about R7.4m, excluding costs, to music group Os Travessos.

The group sued SAA in 2002 for losses it suffered after its equipment was stolen at OR Tambo Internatio­nal on a flight from São Paulo en route to performanc­es in Luanda, Angola. When the group’s baggage claim was denied, it sued SAA, won the case and SAA Brazil was ordered to pay up.

The court order caused SAA to investigat­e the matter, after which it instituted a disciplina­ry hearing against De Oliviera. The airline claimed it had not been informed of problems with theft and loss of luggage and alleged De Oliviera had benefited financiall­y from baggage claims. It then dismissed De Oliviera for “just cause”.

De Oliviera, who had not been permitted legal counsel during his hearing, rejected the charges and took the matter to a regional labour court in São Paolo, which ruled in his favour.

The court found he had been erroneousl­y regarded by SAA as the person responsibl­e for the baggage-claim payouts in question and that the airline incorrectl­y stated it had not been advised of the baggage claims.

The facts were that, in the first instance, SAA was obliged to obey a court order under internatio­nal law. The court found that the person responsibl­e for handling baggage claims at São Paulo’s Guarulhos Internatio­nal Airport (of which Airports Company SA was a shareholde­r) was not subject to oversight by De Oliviera, but by SAA’s London-based Tim Atkinson, the head of internatio­nal operations. The court said whatever irregulari­ties there were in paying baggage claims could not be blamed on De Oliviera.

SAA lodged an appeal, but the court found SAA’s assertions did not stand up to scrutiny. The appeal court upheld the ruling that the amount paid to Os Travessos was agreed by SAA’s lawyers and that SAA failed to show sufficient grounds for De Oliviera’s dismissal.

It awarded R430,000 in punitive damages to De Oliviera for the false accusation of having misappropr­iated SAA’s money, bringing the total awarded to him to about R4m.

SAA appears not to have accepted the ruling as the end of the matter. A spokesman said the airline would not comment “at least at this stage, as the disputed issues are still before the courts”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa