Business Day

Technology centre steps up rhino protection

• Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park uses surveillan­ce equipment to intensify the battle against rampant poaching

- Tony Carnie

Screened behind security fences and a curtain of Zululand thorn bush, a cluster of new buildings and hightech surveillan­ce equipment has sprung up at SA’s most famous rhino sanctuary.

Officially, it is called the Nerve Centre. But there is a smaller signboard outside one of the prefabrica­ted buildings with another name: The Midden.

A midden is a heap of dung where rhinos defecate, with dominant males stomping, snorting and flinging the dung around with their feet to mark their territory boundaries. “This is where all the cr*p happens when it comes to antipoachi­ng operations, so we figured The Midden was as good a name as any,” says a staff member.

Establishe­d with funding from the Peace Parks Foundation, the US State Department and other donors, the centre is the new tactical joint operations centre for antipoachi­ng operations in KwaZulu-Natal.

For security reasons, a small group of journalist­s visiting the centre in Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park recently was cautioned that photograph­ing the main complex and allied infrastruc­ture is forbidden.

Judging from the informatio­n displayed on banks of computer screens at the centre, a wide array of fancy surveillan­ce gizmos has been harnessed to help track down poachers — even before they enter the park.

This includes a combinatio­n of aerial imagery gathered from satellites, patrol aircraft and drones, and motion-triggered camera traps scattered around the 96,000ha park, one of the major hotspots in the national horn-poaching crisis that exploded almost a decade ago.

The new security network also incorporat­es better equipment and communicat­ion devices for rangers out in the field, microchips, DNA sampling kits for rhino horn and the Cmore software technology platform developed by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.

“One of the risks with advanced technology is that you can get drowned in informatio­n. To simplify things, the volume of informatio­n has to be sifted down to make it practical,” an official says.

“For example, our camera traps generated more than 15,000 images last month [January]. Most were triggered by animals, trees or wind, but Cmore filtered this down to just 758 images for further investigat­ion,” the official says.

Although Hluhluwe-Imfolozi is about 20 times smaller than the 2-million-hectare Kruger National Park, crime syndicates have shifted much of their attention to the KwaZulu-Natal reserve known as the “cradle of rhino conservati­on” — it is from where all the world’s remaining wild white rhinos originated.

Southern white rhinos were all but exterminat­ed by hunters more than a century ago, so when a tiny remnant population of fewer than 100 was discovered near the Mfolozi River in the mid 1890s, a new game reserve was establishe­d to safeguard them from extinction.

Gradually, over several decades, the population multiplied and in the early 1960s a major undertakin­g, Operation Rhino, was launched by the former Natal Parks Board to relocate hundreds of white rhinos into the Kruger National Park and other local reserves, neighbouri­ng nations and zoos and safari parks across the world.

WHITE RHINOS

The aim was to shift these valuable eggs out of a single basket, to spread the extinction risk and provide rhinos with more living and breeding space.

It turned out to be one of the world’s most successful conservati­on initiative­s and 10 years ago, SA’s white rhino population had multiplied to almost 20,000 – with about 10,000 of them thought secure in the Kruger Park. But in 2008, horn poachers began to target Kruger’s rich larder of horns.

Peace Parks Foundation CE Werner Myburgh says that initially 80% of the poachers were from Mozambique. Now, less than 30% of Kruger poaching originates from Mozambique. Most poachers are now thought to operate from Mpumalanga.

Myburgh says that while killings in Kruger have dropped significan­tly in the past three years, horn gangs have shifted their focus to KwaZulu-Natal and other provinces.

“Right now HluhluweiM­folozi is feeling the pressure. It is relentless; it is every day.”

Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife CE Bheki Khoza likens it to an “avalanche”. The pressure on the park is higher than anywhere else in the country.

From negligible poaching rates 10 years ago, killings rose sharply in KwaZulu-Natal to 100 animals in 2014 and more than doubled to 222 killings in 2017.

“I am hopeful that the new integrated joint operationa­l plan that we are now embarking on will be a game changer,” Khoza says. “I am not saying it will totally eradicate rhino poaching‚ but I know it will form a critical component of efforts to reduce illegal wildlife crime.”

Myburgh says that if rhino horn consumers in China, Vietnam and other eastern nations can be persuaded to change their ways, there would be no poaching problem.

“But we are not there yet,” he says, leaving conservati­on authoritie­s with ever-mounting security bills and risks.

Sherry Sykes, US consulgene­ral in Durban, says wildlife crimes have to be deterred in every way possible. “Wildlife crime is a crime and it needs to be treated just like any other crime. This is why the US government has provided millions of dollars to SA and other nations to engage with wildlife crime,” she says.

The cost of the centre has not been disclosed, but it is understood that the Peace Parks Foundation provided a substantia­l contributi­on, with further funding from the US Bureau of Internatio­nal Narcotics and Law Enforcemen­t Affairs.

While the new security advances in Hluhluwe-iMfolozi have been welcomed by conservati­on groups, some observers remain sceptical.

Peter Hartley, a veteran iMfolozi park ranger who now lives in Australia, says technology will not save the rhino.

“Going back to the basics and getting this right is more important,” Hartley says.

“Employing all the components and fundamenta­ls of good counter- and antipoachi­ng is the key. Once you have these functionin­g, then complement your security operations with technology,” he says.

“If you throw technology in without a sound security management base you have nothing. Protected area security is not rocket science, but it requires experience, training and committed staff with resources commensura­te with the tasks at hand and government/political support,” Hartley says.

Ezemvelo rhino security co-ordinator Cedric Coetzee agrees that technology alone will not halt the poaching crisis.

“This is not just about sitting in an office and looking at computer screens, but also about how security works on the ground,” Coetzee says.

“This why we are working closely with the South African Police Service, the State Security Agency and private sector groups,” he says.

Coetzee and Myburgh are confident that rhino poaching in KwaZulu-Natal will start to slow down and eventually decrease.

“We have the building blocks in place now. Turning the graph downwards won’t happen overnight,” Myburgh says. “It could take 12-18 months to turn.

“Unfortunat­ely, when the poaching heat is reduced in Hluhluwe-iMfolozi, the problem will be displaced to other parks elsewhere in the country.”

 ?? /Supplied ?? Moving target: From negligible southern white rhino poaching rates 10 years ago, killings rose sharply in KwaZulu-Natal to 100 animals in 2014 and more than doubled to 222 killings in 2017. That is while killings in the Kruger National Park dropped...
/Supplied Moving target: From negligible southern white rhino poaching rates 10 years ago, killings rose sharply in KwaZulu-Natal to 100 animals in 2014 and more than doubled to 222 killings in 2017. That is while killings in the Kruger National Park dropped...
 ?? /Supplied ?? Drawing a line: The Nerve Centre in Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, where poaching has been intensifyi­ng.
/Supplied Drawing a line: The Nerve Centre in Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, where poaching has been intensifyi­ng.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa