Business Day

Tribunal quashes move to rush Chevron merger

- Lisa Steyn Mining and Energy Writer

An attempt by a Glencoreba­cked investor to hurry the Competitio­n Commission’s investigat­ion into its proposed acquisitio­n of Chevron SA was thwarted by the Competitio­n Tribunal on Wednesday.

Off the Shelf Investment­s, the acquiring party, asked the tribunal not to give the commission an extension as a framework agreement with the government was now in place and addressed the concerns of the third parties involved.

The tribunal, however, granted the commission an extension of 15 business days, as requested, in order to consult parties.

The commission’s representa­tive, Maya Swart, indicated that the framework agreement included some changes of significan­ce — for example, the black economic empowermen­t shareholdi­ng requiremen­t, as it had been understood, was not part of the agreement.

“The commission has a duty to investigat­e concerns and must be in a position to do so,” said tribunal panel member Andreas Wessels.

“I don’t think the merging parties are being reasonable.” The commission’s deadline is now August 20.

The $973m deal would see Glencore, a global commoditie­s giant, acquire 75% of Chevron SA’s assets and empowermen­t partners acquire 25%.

The assets include a 110,000 barrel-a-day refinery, a lubricants plant, 820 petrol stations and oil storage facilities.

Hong Kong-based Sinopec announced plans to acquire Chevron SA in March 2017, but in October Glencore outfoxed its competitor by backing Off the Shelf Investment­s, Chevron SA’s minority shareholde­r, which then exercised its right of first refusal of the deal.

The subsequent merger notice was filed on November 7 2017 and the initial period of 40 days for investigat­ion, as defined in law, expired on January 5 2018. Since then 10 extensions were agreed to.

The commission argued that the delays were through no fault of its own, as it failed to receive timeous updates from the merging parties, third parties and other stakeholde­rs who were involved in protracted negotiatio­ns. The commission argued it had been given consent to share the framework agreement — reached with the Department of Economic Developmen­t — with third parties only on Monday evening.

Third parties include the Chemical, Energy, Paper, Printing, Wood and Allied Workers Union; Branded Marketers, custodians of the Caltex brand; and Chevron retirees.

The legal representa­tive for Off the Shelf Investment­s, Omphemetse Mooki, argued the commission had not explained why it should be granted yet another extension. He said a confidenti­al version of the agreement had been with the commission since July 20.

Wessels said the merging parties were responsibl­e for the delays and had known they had to submit a non-confidenti­al version of the agreement to engage third parties.

COMMISSION’S DELAYS WERE THROUGH NO FAULT OF ITS OWN, AS IT FAILED TO RECEIVE TIMEOUS UPDATES FROM MERGING PARTIES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa