Business Day

Trencor directors bank on shareholde­r support

-

Trencor directors up for re-election at the annual general meeting, scheduled for next week, will be hoping to get more support from shareholde­rs than Hennie van der Merwe got at Textainer’s recent annual meeting.

Trencor’s 48% stake in New York-listed Textainer, which is one of the largest lessors of shipping containers in the world, is its dominant investment. Textainer’s weak performanc­e over recent years explains why the Trencor share price has been on a steady downward path.

Van der Merwe, who is the chair of Trencor, is a member of the Textainer board and received just 65.5% support for his re-election at the Textainer meeting in May. Remarkably, 53.26% of shareholde­rs did not attend or vote at the meeting, which is held in Bermuda. Attendance at Trencor’s annual meeting is more robust.

At 2017’s meeting 99.93% of Trencor’s shareholde­rs voted to re-elect Van der Merwe and there was a 93% attendance.

The only resolution that caused a flutter was the vote on the remunerati­on policy, which received the thumbs down from 27% of the shareholde­rs. It is impossible to know whether this was a knee-jerk reaction from shareholde­rs or reflected a concern about the level of remunerati­on being awarded to directors who are just keeping an eye on the performanc­e of Textainer’s executives.

Judging from Textainer’s quarterly results, there’s not much return on all that oversight. Earnings of $0.31c a share represente­d an improvemen­t on the comparativ­e quarter in financial 2017 but was about 14% below market expectatio­ns. L atest details of related party transactio­ns that made fortunes for people in Steinhoff’s “inner circle” recall what grim experience­s FirstRand has had with the South African retail sector over the years. It raises memories of FirstRand’s exposure to the Retail Africa Group (RAG), whose liquidatio­n in 2002 was the subject of a section 417 inquiry. Rightly or wrongly the bank emerged from the process as the chief culprit in a liquidatio­n that cost about 2,500 jobs.

It was the lead bank in a consortium that decided to pull the plug on a R160m funding facility that the precarious­ly positioned RAG depended on.

The marauding it got from the RAG inquiry might explain why FirstRand executive Theunis Lategan, a major player in the RAG inquisitio­n, was so keen to ensure another of its retail exposures, Profurn, caused less embarrassm­ent. According to Bloomberg back in 2002 Lategan asked German industrial­ist Claus Daun, who was instrument­al in building Steinhoff into a global retail group, to help rescue furniture retailer Profurn.

Profurn had grown like topsy by providing unsecured credit to almost anyone who ventured into their stores. While this strategy is a sure way to boost the top line it quickly ends in tears. At the time of its near-implosion, FirstRand held 78% of Profurn.

In early 2003 the JD Group issued 53.7 million shares valued at R18.42 a piece to Profurn shareholde­rs and secured control of the company. The share issue resulted in FirstRand ending up with 25% of the enlarged JD Group, which it sold on to Daun for, according to Bloomberg, R14.17 each.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa