Business Day

Nepi Rockcastle rejects probe call

• Ten institutio­ns unable to clarify what they want to have investigat­ed, says CEO as company awaits report from watchdog

- Alistair Anderson Property Writer andersona@businessli­ve.co.za

Nepi Rockcastle, part of the Resilient group of property companies at the centre of allegation­s of insider trading and share price manipulati­on, has rejected requests by 10 of SA’s largest financial institutio­ns for a probe into the entire stable.

Nepi Rockcastle, part of the Resilient group of property companies at the centre of allegation­s of insider trading and share price manipulati­on, has rejected requests by 10 of SA’s largest financial institutio­ns for a probe into the entire stable.

CEO Alex Morar said no investigat­ion could go ahead without a clear scope of what would be investigat­ed.

In addition to Resilient and Nepi Rockcastle, the group comprises Fortress and Greenbay Properties. The four companies, which had been outperform­ing on the JSE, suddenly came under sustained selling pressure in January 2018.

Nepi Rockcastle’s share price is down nearly 40% since the start of the year.

The 10 institutio­ns wanted an independen­t investigat­ion led by one of the big four accounting firms to probe numerous allegation­s around the Resilient group. These include suggestion­s that there has been insider trading in the shares of its companies and that their stock may have been manipulate­d.

Morar said Nepi Rockcastle had created a subcommitt­ee which had determined that a blanket investigat­ion into the company was not feasible.

“We have spent the past few weeks engaging with the institutio­ns which sent us the letter. Some of them are invested in Nepi Rockcastle, some have been in the past and some have not. As it stands they have not clearly said what they want to investigat­e and why.

“Some kind of blanket investigat­ion is unfeasible and unreasonab­le. Also, a forensic investigat­ion is not desired by our broader shareholde­r base, so we are not going ahead with one,” Morar said.

In an unpreceden­ted move, asset management firms which collective­ly manage trillions of rand on behalf of millions of investors, including the Public Investment Corporatio­n (PIC), sought an investigat­ion after the collapse in the companies’ shares cost investors about R120bn in value. The action was seen as a potential turning point for corporate governance in SA as investors typically refrain from publicly criticisin­g companies in which they hold shares.

A conference call with investors has been recorded and is available on the Nepi Rockcastle website. Morar said Nepi Rockcastle would now wait for the investigat­ion by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority to end.

The authority’s probe has been continuing since March and is focused on possible insider trading and price manipulati­on, as well as potential false and misleading reporting with regard to the four companies.

Garreth Elston, a portfolio manager at Reitway Global, said Nepi Rockcastle had made good progress in dealing with the concerns of shareholde­rs and a probe would not add value at this stage.

“While the Financial Sector Conduct Authority’s investigat­ion timespan is not clear at the moment, we see it as premature to look for additional investigat­ions to be undertaken before the regulator has completed and announced the results of its investigat­ion,” Elston said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa