Business Day

M&R withdraws directors’ names

- Ann Crotty

In a dramatic last-minute developmen­t, engineerin­g group Murray & Roberts (M&R) was forced to withdraw resolution­s relating to the re-election of four board directors shortly before Thursday’s general meeting.

In a dramatic last-minute developmen­t, engineerin­g group Murray & Roberts (M&R) was forced to withdraw resolution­s relating to the re-election of four board directors shortly before Thursday’s annual general meeting (AGM).

This was to avoid their reelection being blocked by German investment firm Aton, which holds 44% of M&R.

It follows this week’s ruling by the Competitio­n Appeal Court allowing Aton to vote most of its M&R shares. The privately owned German firm, which bought an initial stake in M&R in 2015, made an offer for control in April 2018, by which time it had a stake of 29.99%.

By early June, after offering R17 a share, Aton had increased its holding to 44%. The independen­t board of M&R says a “fairvalue price range” for control of the company is between R20 and R22 a share.

On Thursday, M&R said it had withdrawn the four resolution­s needed to re-elect Ralph Havenstein, Ntombi LangaRoyds, Keith Spence and Henry Laas because the company was still subject to a mandatory offer by Aton.

The regulation­s controllin­g takeovers prohibit directors from resigning from a board from the date an offer is made until it is declared unconditio­nal, lapses or is withdrawn. The regulation­s only prohibit directors from resigning. They make no reference to a director who is due to retire by rotation.

The agenda for the AGM was sent to investors on September 28. Ed Jardim, M&R’s group investor and media executive, said on Thursday the board “obtained a legal opinion from our attorneys and only thereafter engaged with the JSE as to the plan to withdraw these affected resolution­s at the AGM”.

Three weeks before the notice of the AGM was sent to shareholde­rs, M&R appealed to the Competitio­n Appeal Court to restrict Aton’s voting to 29.99%. M&R argued that if Aton did vote all its shares, it would be able to exercise control over the meeting and therefore over M&R.

Aton dismissed this argument and said recent attendance at M&R shareholde­r meetings showed that 44% would not be sufficient to sway the outcome of the AGM.

It gave the court an undertakin­g that it would restrict its voting to 50% less one of the votes at the AGM.

Investors representi­ng 87.64% of the shares participat­ed at the meeting. The results indicate Aton did not vote against any resolution­s but it did abstain from voting to appoint Emma Mashilwane, Diane Radley and Spence to the audit and sustainabi­lity committee.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa