Business Day

Quantitati­ve analysis has a part to play in world of big data

Investment-management industry uses data-screening tools to help identify good stocks

- Hannes van den Berg and Terry Seaward ● Van den Berg is co-head of SA Equity & Multi-Asset, and Seaward is portfolio manager at Investec Asset Management.

According to IBM, we create 2.5quintilli­on bytes of data every day, with 90% of the world’s data having been produced in the past two years alone. Businesses across the spectrum, from social media and entertainm­ent to banking and investment­s, have recognised the benefits of harnessing big data.

Advances in intelligen­t technologi­es have resulted in data-screening tools (quantitati­ve analysis) gaining a strong foothold in the investment management industry. When it comes to finding good companies in which to invest, informatio­n and timing are key. This requires the ability to process huge volumes of informatio­n from multiple sources speedily.

A quantitati­ve approach uses mathematic­al and statistica­l modelling that collects immense volumes of data at lightning speed to help identify good investment ideas and assess portfolio risks. To put it in perspectiv­e, more than 16million discrete pieces of informatio­n feed into constructi­ng a portfolio from a 4,000-stock universe. Quant analysts are often described as data analysts working in finance, as they need to be highly skilled in maths, statistics, computer science and finance.

When it comes to big data and machine learning, public debate tends to pit humans against machines, reinforcin­g the stereotype of an us versus them scenario, rather than entertaini­ng a “marriage of two minds”. Even within the asset management industry, it is common to find that active equity managers only employ quantitati­ve analysis as an initial screening tool to identify good

investment ideas based on a specific set of criteria. So quants are often used as a filter to narrow a large investment universe, after which fundamenta­l analysts take over.

In our view, each approach has key strengths. Essentiall­y, we capitalise on the best attributes of both. Quantitati­ve screening offers discipline, repeatabil­ity, objectivit­y and efficiency, while bottom-up fundamenta­l research provides depth, human insight and judgment.

Our quantitati­ve stock screen research and fundamenta­l analysis run parallel to each other, so the one process is not relegated to a supporting act: both have a star billing. The investment ideas that are identified by both our quantitati­ve and fundamenta­l analysts typically represent our high-conviction stock picks in the Investec Equity Fund.

For example, Anglo American and BHP Billiton came up as top picks based on our quantitati­ve and fundamenta­l research. These stocks represent a material holding in the Investec Equity Fund. As the two research processes run independen­tly, one may identify a stock as a good or bad investment idea that may not be supported by the other. Both may fuel debate, highlighti­ng the need for further analysis of an investment idea. This integrated approach cuts risk of “overconfid­ence”, which can be a pitfall where idea generation favours only one of these two research processes.

Portfolio constructi­on and risk management are complex processes for humans. Building a simple 30-stock portfolio requires managing hundreds of pieces of expected return, risk and related informatio­n, easy for a machine but hard for a human. Some asset managers will try to manage risk by limiting the weighting of an individual stock or by imposing sector-specific exposures.

We believe these measures are a blunt way to manage risk, as they constrain potential outperform­ance and do not consider the multiple correlatio­ns between stocks and sectors.

Proprietar­y quant tools allow us to combine key risk and return metrics to optimise our portfolio and maximise diversific­ation. Our internally developed system provides crucial informatio­n on a pretrade basis. For example, before we implement a trade to reduce allocation to one stock in favour of another, the system tells us how it will affect overall portfolio risk. While our proprietar­y models have greatly enhanced the risk-management and portfolio-constructi­on process, human insight and common sense remain crucial. Fundamenta­l analysts are best placed to interpret breaking company news, market dynamics, regulatory or tax changes, and environmen­tal, social and governance (ESG) issues. We believe fundamenta­l and quantitati­ve analysis have an important role to play in finding good stock ideas, as well as constructi­ng a portfolio and managing risk.

Over the past eight years we have refined our investment process, blending quantitati­ve analysis with fundamenta­l insight to produce more consistent investment returns for our investors.

PUBLIC DEBATE TENDS TO PIT HUMANS AGAINST MACHINES, REINFORCIN­G THE STEREOTYPE OF AN US VS THEM SCENARIO

 ?? /123RF/ Denis Ismagilov ?? Wealth of benefits: Businesses of every descriptio­n now recognise the many benefits they are deriving from making use of big data.
/123RF/ Denis Ismagilov Wealth of benefits: Businesses of every descriptio­n now recognise the many benefits they are deriving from making use of big data.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa