US has trillions but it is snarled up in chaos
• The cheques are not in the mail because of outdated technology, confusion over policy and overwhelming claims
The US government’s huge effort to nurse the economy through the coronavirus crisis was billed as a “send money and don’t sweat the details” flood of cash to people and businesses in a $22-trillion system that has ground to a halt.
The US government’s huge effort to nurse the economy through the coronavirus crisis was billed as a “send money and don’t sweat the details” flood of cash to people and businesses in a $22-trillion system that has ground to a halt.
So far, the cheques are not in the mail.
From technological glitches to confusion over the fine points of policy, the delays are mounting. The federal government’s muddled response risks deepening and lengthening a recession already historic for the speed of its onset.
States are struggling to process an unprecedented mountain of unemployment claims on outdated technology. Large corporations, including companies slammed by the social distancing edicts that are keeping people at home, remain in the dark on the details of promised loans. Small businesses by the millions are desperately seeking cash, while banks still lack the right paperwork days into a lending programme.
The Federal Reserve, quick to throw a backstop under large portions of the financial system and major corporations through open-ended bond purchases, has yet to complete a promised “Main Street” programme of an all-encompassing safety net of credit.
Making matters worse, the original $2.3-trillion in aid that was passed by Congress late last month isn’t nearly enough, businesses warn.
Every day that passes without federal money getting to people is “an unnecessary hit to businesses and households across the US”, said Gregory Daco, chief US economist at Oxford Economics.
Speed was considered of the essence when the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (Cares) Act became law on March 27, committing the $2.3-trillion to make up for the wages and incomes lost after Americans were ordered to stay home to control the spread of the coronavirus.
It was a rare moment of bipartisanship in Washington, with both liberal and conservative economists mostly agreeing that was not the time to argue philosophical points about moral hazard, misplaced incentives or the dangers of public debt, but to get money to people before they were bankrupt or hungry.
As infections of Covid-19 rose in the US, so did concerns that without a broad government backstop, businesses would fail and households default on loans at such a scale that it would collapse the financial system as well. Instead of a quick “V-shaped” recession, with a deep drop but a fast and sharp rebound, delay could generate more chronic, systemic problems.
But theory and practice have diverged. States have struggled with the sheer volume of unemployment claims, which rocketed from a couple of hundred thousand a week in what was an era of historically low unemployment to millions at a time. More than half of states, including California, New York and Pennsylvania, still rely on decades-old mainframe systems based on the Cobol computing language first introduced in 1959.
GIG ECONOMY
Efforts to extend benefits to workers in the gig economy, a key element of the rescue bill, have not yet been explained on state unemployment websites.
The timetable for a different bit of individual assistance, cheques of up to $1,200 per person, is also unclear.
Major corporations, including airlines, due for direct loans under the $2.3-trillion emergency legislation, are still waiting for detailed guidance from the US treasury department on how and when it will show up.
Perhaps most unnerving to America’s millions of momand-pop restaurants, smaller manufacturers and other small businesses considered the spine of the US economy, the promise of quick cheques and forgivable loans has fallen flat.
When the $350bn “payroll protection programme” was launched last week, treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin said small entrepreneurs, as of last Friday, could “walk into a bank ... and get money”.
Instead, there has been a maze of red tape.
Lenders have complained about conflicting or incomplete information from the treasury and the Small Business Administration. Businesses say banks have not been responsive or have limited access to their existing customers. “This has been a mess,” one business banker in the Midwest said.
The rollout has been so patchy that the Fed had to step in on Monday with a blanket offer to banks to take the small business loans into a new programme of its own.
Even Band-Aid emergency cash hasn’t shown up. Borrowers applying under the Small Business Administration’s disaster loan programme last Monday could check a box to receive $10,000 as an advance on the loan in three days. More than a week later, several borrowers said they hadn’t received the money.
The administration did not respond to a request for information.
On Tuesday, Mnuchin asked Congress for an additional $250bn for the programme because the demand by businesses has been so great.
Most Trump administration officials have acknowledged hiccups but also maintain they’ll meet the aim of the legislation: to help people and businesses before rent and bond payments, and food bills come due.
“I can assure you, the president has instructed us to get this money into the economy fast,” Mnuchin told Fox Business Network on Tuesday. The treasury is meeting airline advisers and “working very quickly” on getting them loans, he said.
President Donald Trump, under pressure over the administration’s overall Covid19 response and facing an election in November, has denied any problems.
On Saturday, Trump said he hadn’t heard of any glitches in a small business lending programme and berated a reporter who asked about it. “That’s so false. We’re way ahead of schedules,” he said.
The Fed has already rolled out many programmes at scale and with a speed unmatched during the 2008 financial crisis. But the Fed’s ultimate rescue effort is still in the works: a potential $4.5-trillion programme that could open its vault to mid-size and smaller companies, municipal governments and perhaps even less creditworthy corporations pushed to the brink.
Like Mnuchin, Fed officials have promised details “soon”. Until that happens, key parts of the “real” economy are in a sort of suspended animation waiting to know what sort of lifeline is coming, how quickly and on what terms.
BOND MARKET
Cities, states, counties and other government entities are unable to borrow in the $4-trillion municipal bond market except at extremely high short-term rates as their sales and income tax revenues plunge.
“You can’t raise new money for your water system or your middle school or any of that because there are no buyers for it, so you’ve got a lot of deals that are essentially shelved,” said Emily Brock, policy director for the Government Finance Officers Association.
She said if the Fed buys up secondary-market securities, there will be room for new issuance. “We’re asking the Federal Reserve to be that savvy investor, to make other investors feel comfortable to help to drive down the yields we’re seeing.”
THE ORIGINAL $2.3-TRILLION IN AID THAT WAS PASSED BY CONGRESS LATE LAST MONTH ISN ’ T NEARLY ENOUGH, BUSINESSES WARN
STATES HAVE STRUGGLED WITH THE SHEER VOLUME OF UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMS, WHICH ROCKETED TO MILLIONS AT A TIME