Business Day

Solidarity takes funding fight to top court

- Luyolo Mkentane Political Writer mkentanel@businessli­ve.co.za

Trade union Solidarity is approachin­g the Constituti­onal Court to appeal a lower court’s ruling allowing the tourism department to use empowermen­t as a considerat­ion when dishing out R300m in state relief to cushion the sector from the effects of Covid-19.

The union has also laid a charge of perjury against small business developmen­t minister Khumbudzo Ntshavheni for allegedly contradict­ing herself over her department’s decision to use race as a criterion to help distressed companies affected by the coronaviru­s.

Solidarity CEO Dirk Hermann said on Monday the union will also file a complaint with the UN Committee on the Eliminatio­n of Racial Discrimina­tion regarding the matter.

This comes after the joint applicatio­n by Solidarity and Afrikaner rights group AfriForum to review and set aside tourism minister Mmamoloko Kubayi-Ngubane’s decision to provide support to distressed firms and establishm­ents in the sector based on broad-based BEE (B-BBEE) codes was dismissed by the high court in Pretoria on Saturday.

The court ruled that the department’s decision to consider empowermen­t codes as grounds for assisting firms was not unlawful. It ruled that this does not give some candidates an unfair advantage over others based on race but rather gives those candidates a head start.

Ntshavheni attracted the perjury charge after she allegedly told Solidarity “under oath and in court documents” that race would not be a criterion for assisting distressed small businesses affected by Covid-19.

She had said at an interminis­terial briefing in Pretoria on March 24 that the purported racial requiremen­t was fake news and stressed: “We are supporting all small and medium enterprise­s across SA and there are no race requiremen­ts for funding.”

However, she said at the joint meeting of the portfolio and select committees for small business developmen­t in parliament last Tuesday that BEE would be used as a considerat­ion for providing support to small, medium and micro enterprise­s (SMMEs).

“It is a fundamenta­l requiremen­t for transformi­ng the economy of this country; we cannot choose as and when we use it,” she said when asked by National Council of Provinces DA member Tim Brauteseth to provide clarity on criteria to determine relief measures for SMMEs.

“B-BBEE is a critical requiremen­t. We need South Africans … to own and have a share in the economy of this country.

“So when applicatio­ns come through, we evaluate them on their need. But we consider demographi­c representa­tion, which does not only include race — it includes gender, it includes geographic location, it includes age, which is youth, it also includes people with disabiliti­es. So those are fundamenta­l to the transforma­tion of this economy,” she said at the time.

Hermann said: “We cannot just leave it at that when a minister lies in court documents. It would make a mockery of the legal process. Solidarity withdrew a court case against the minister and her department based on what she undertook under oath.”

Solidarity was of the opinion that it had no choice but to proceed with a criminal charge against Ntshavheni, stressing that granting relief aid on the basis of race “is still bizarre”.

“We have laid a criminal charge against the minister [at the Lyttelton police station in Pretoria],” said Hermann.

“We will also lodge an urgent appeal to the Constituti­onal Court and file a complaint with the UN Committee on the Eliminatio­n of Racial Discrimina­tion.”

However, Ntshavheni’s spokespers­on Priscilla Monama hit back, telling Business Day on Monday that to suggest the minister lied under oath “is to call her character into question”.

“This is not only unbecoming of Solidarity but highly unfortunat­e in the time where the preoccupat­ion should be our collective efforts in fighting the Covid19 pandemic,” said Monama.

She dismissed Solidarity’s allegation­s against the minister as “malicious”, saying they seek to “derail the progress” made by the high court in dismissing its joint applicatio­n last week.

“[The] minister will accordingl­y defend such claims through relevant legal platforms and within the ambit of legal prescripts and does not seek to detail her response to the allegation­s while the matter is sub judice,” said Monama.

“To subject the court and its essential-service workers to baseless accusation­s by Solidarity is a mockery to the legal system. The department respects the principle of justice and fairness and will rely on the courts to exercise their fiduciary duty.”

Hermann said he was concerned that the government was preoccupie­d with skin colour while businesses were taking a knock from the Covid-19 pandemic, which as of Monday had infected 7,220 and killed 138 people in SA.

“We will not cease fighting this,” Hermann vowed.

On April 21, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced a R500bn social and economic package for SA that was welcomed by business for emphasisin­g the need to rescue small businesses.

About 70% of SMMEs employing about 6-million people have been hit hard by the Covid-19 pandemic and could be forced to close when the lockdown is lifted.

The value of assistance to SMMEs is more than R100m, and an additional R2bn would be made available to support them, Ramaphosa has said.

SOLIDARITY WITHDREW A COURT CASE AGAINST THE MINISTER BASED ON WHAT SHE UNDERTOOK UNDER OATH

 ?? /Desiree Swart ?? Court battle: Solidarity CEO Dirk Hermann says the union will also file a complaint with the UN.
/Desiree Swart Court battle: Solidarity CEO Dirk Hermann says the union will also file a complaint with the UN.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa