Business Day

Shaking up the empire’s Shakespear­e blind spots

• Some online production­s are not for jingoes

- CHRIS THURMAN

Itry not “other life to”write as an about academic Shakespear­e too often in this column, because I spend a large chunk of my talking about the Man from Stratford. This is both a gesture towards journalist­ic integrity (I don’t think it’s fair to impose my scholarly interests on readers) and a self-serving measure (keeping myself from becoming bored or boring).

But Shakespear­e’s plays constitute about 4% of the profession­al production­s staged around the world every year; almost 50,000 books about him published annually; and he continuall­y crops up in music and the visual arts, whether as an earnest or an ironic point of reference. So I reckon I wouldn’t be doing my job as an arts writer if I didn’t give him any coverage.

With the variations on lockdown that have been implemente­d around the world over the last two months, and our collective obsession with digital arts content. Shakespear­e’s prominence has only increased. Well-meaning friends and colleagues keep sharing links with me. My phone pings incessantl­y.

“Did you know that the Royal Shakespear­e Company is streaming X production for free?”

“Thought you’d be glad to hear that Shakespear­e’s Globe has put up Y content on YouTube.”

“This dodgy Google Drive link includes loads of films, and one of them is Shakespear­e adaptation Z.”

Don’t get me wrong: I always appreciate it, and I know they’re trying to speak my love language. But the problem is I’m not so much a Shakespear­ean as a kind of anti-Shakespear­ean. Over the years I’ve become more and more interested in how the plays serve certain ideologica­l functions, how they can be flashpoint­s for sociopolit­ical debate, how they intersect with SA history and current affairs, and how their place in education opens up wider discussion­s about language, race and resources in the classroom.

It’s not really “on brand” for me to gush about some amazing Shakespear­e production performed in London a few years ago. The odd effect of all this is that I’ve taught myself to dislike any form of Shakespear­e that comes from — um, where Shakespear­e came from. I end up avoiding British (and, specifical­ly, English) production­s because watching them would seem to acquiesce to all the jingoistic Anglophile ideas about Shakespear­e and the “sceptred isle” I spend most of my working week opposing.

This is a rather grim, not to mention paradoxica­l, reality to occupy if you do, like me — despite it all — enjoy watching Shakespear­e’s plays. Happily, this week, I experience­d something of a Damascene conversion; or perhaps, to keep up the biblical analogy, it was more of an Emmaus Road experience, bringing me back into the Shakespear­ean fold.

The means of my reawakenin­g was a videostrea­ming service recently launched in SA, Marquee TV. Pitched at arts enthusiast­s who are tired of Netflix, Showmax, Hulu, Apple TV and the like — which have a very limited offering when it comes to recorded stage performanc­es — Marquee TV offers the best of the Bolshoi and the New York City Ballet, the Royal Opera House and the Teatro Real, and much more on demand.

This includes, of course, the Royal Shakespear­e Company. But Marquee’s best Shakespear­e is director Phyllida Lloyd’s trilogy of Julius Caesar, Henry

IV and The Tempest, each staged at the Donmar Warehouse. These production­s are notable for their womenonly casts, but for much more than that. First, they are set in a women’s prison. This setting acknowledg­es the role of the inmates and prison theatre practition­ers with whom Lloyd collaborat­ed; it also creates a rich interplay between the world within the prison and the world outside, emphasisin­g the metatheatr­ical aspects of Shakespear­e’s plays, which so often foreground the slippage between reality and illusion.

Second, they succeed in demonstrat­ing that — just as there is no normative way that “Shakespear­e” looks or sounds — the UK is not the homogeneou­s place Brexiteers and Tory ethnonatio­nalists want to believe it is: the diversity of Lloyd’s cast in terms of age, accent and race demonstrat­es this beyond any doubt. That’s the kind of Shakespear­e I’ll sign up for any day.

So thank you, Marquee TV! I look forward to more revelation­s.

 ?? /Helen Maybanks ?? Rich interplay: Clare Dunne and Harriet Walter in Phyllida Lloyd’s ‘Henry IV’, set in a women’s prison, can be watched on Marquee TV.
/Helen Maybanks Rich interplay: Clare Dunne and Harriet Walter in Phyllida Lloyd’s ‘Henry IV’, set in a women’s prison, can be watched on Marquee TV.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa