Business Day

Paying taxis may get more people to pay their taxes. What does Beyoncé think?

- EATON TOM ● Eaton is an Arena Holdings columnist.

It’s not often that Fikile Mbalula, minister of transport and patron saint of sheltered employment, gets to announce huge policy decisions. At best, he is a sort of talking clock, wheeled out once a year to announce the latest death toll on SA’s staggering­ly murderous roads, and to explain his plan to make them fractional­ly less murderous, which is to ask South Africans to drive a bit better. At worst, he is, well, the same politician he’s been since he led the ANC Youth League.

On Friday, however, Mbalula found himself at the forefront of national policy, like a fraying teddy bear tied to the bugsplatte­red radiator of a speeding dump truck, happily insisting that the state will be subsidisin­g SA’s taxi industry by April 2021.

As a brand-building exercise, it was a triumph. Gone were the usual headlines —“Mbaks is flames as he claps back in celeb twar!” — as Mbalula found himself the subject of proper news reported by proper journalist­s.

One respected newspaper used a word usually reserved for actual power brokers, saying Mbalula “backs” the subsidy, as if he is an elder statesman and not a swivel-eyed sock-puppet with the gravitas of a Saturday morning cartoon and the political track record of a length of loo paper stuck to the heel of power.

Still, I suppose even Mbalula has to do minister-y things from time to time, and it’s possible he backed up his position by spending 15 minutes on Google (“What does Beyoncé think about subsidisin­g SA’s taxi industry? ”) before asking his Twitter followers to vote on whether he looks more stylish posing in front of a subsidised taxi or an unsubsidis­ed one.

To be fair, he’s not alone. Pragmatist­s have been insisting for years that the taxi industry needs to be acknowledg­ed and engaged with as a sort of parastatal organisati­on that carries out the essential work of transporti­ng SA’s labour force to and from work.

I’ve also seen pundits arguing that subsidisin­g the industry, and so formalisin­g it, will bring it and its owners into range of the big guns of the SA Revenue Service. I must admit this sounds a little like paying people to pay their taxes, but I am not an expert.

Then again, nobody is less of an expert than Mbalula, and I imagine he will be grateful for any deal that will give him more authority in his dealings with the taxi industry, or at least help him avoid the sort of scenes we saw during lockdown, when he warned taxi bosses that if they didn ’ t stop overfillin­g taxis he would withhold foot massages for the rest of the day.

Still, there will no doubt be a great deal of unhappines­s about the idea in the coming weeks, not least because of its timing: it seems a strange coincidenc­e indeed that, in the wreckage of a broken economy, the ANC plans to start funnelling fortunes to taxi bosses a few months before elections in which it faces a real threat of losing big metros.

I’m trying to keep an open mind. Taxi bosses don’t seem like ideal bureaucrat­s, but perhaps we’re underestim­ating them. Certainly, if they ran SA’s trains cable theft would stop within 48 hours. Have we considered the potential of appointing them to set up and run the new national airline? Imagine how festive it would be for internatio­nal visitors to be welcomed aboard Golden Banana Air or Dreamlover Internatio­nal by an official gaatjie, who then leans out of an open door all the way back to OR Tambo yelling “London Wynberg Cape Town!” Imagine the exotic delights of landing amid the brightly burning carcasses of British Airways and Lufthansa aircraft, left there as warnings to rival airlines.

It ’ s fun to dream, but the reality is far grimmer. Because Mbalula’s plan isn’t a solution. It ’ s unconditio­nal surrender.

The Sunday Times reported that just one in five SA commuter railway lines is functionin­g, albeit erraticall­y. If four out of five suburban streets or national highways were physically unusable there wouldn’t be talk of subsidies as the transport minister would be too terrified to appear in public until the last of the car-driving middle class had emigrated from what would be a failed state.

But the poor can’t emigrate, so they pay and pay and pay half their income on average to travel on taxis that charge three times more than trains.

The taxificati­on of SA gathers pace as all the Mbalulas let systems rust and rot and die, and hard, anonymous privateers, flanked by muscle and guns, step into the void and name their price. Sorry, I mean “negotiate a subsidy”.

THE POOR CAN’T EMIGRATE, SO THEY PAY AND PAY AND PAY HALF THEIR INCOME ... TO TRAVEL ON TAXIS

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa