Business Day

Fixing SA’s failing schools requires an entirely new leadership team

Corruption in system and Sadtu’s capture of education, to the detriment of pupils around the country, persists

- Ann Bernstein ● Bernstein heads the Centre for Developmen­t & Enterprise. This article is based on ‘The Silent Crisis: Time to fix SA’s schools’, a new series of five reports by the centre.

TPresident hough the Cyril bar is Ramaphosa admittedly’ s low, basic education minister Angie Motshekga has been one of the best performers in cabinet. In office since 2009, she appears to genuinely care about basic education, seems to be on top of her brief and has not been involved in corruption scandals. Yet in the Centre for Developmen­t & Enterprise’s latest series of reports on the education system we call for her removal from office — along with her director-general and top team. This is an unpreceden­ted call to action from the centre — one we do not make lightly.

The minister did achieve some success in the early years of her tenure, including, most importantl­y, the 2011 establishm­ent of the National Education Evaluation & Developmen­t Unit (Needu), and the introducti­on in the same year of the annual national assessment­s, both of which increased accountabi­lity levels by raising awareness about the performanc­e of the public schooling system.

However, these attempts at reform have since been withdrawn or diluted. Needu is not the independen­t arms-length evaluation body originally envisaged, and after an initial report exposing corruption in rural schools, it has been sidelined. The assessment­s were cancelled in 2015, largely as a result of opposition from the SA Democratic Teachers Union (Sadtu).

It took until 2021 for the annual national assessment­s to be replaced with sample-based assessment­s for grades 3, 6 and 9. But these test only a small number of schools every three or four years, which does not allow the same pupils to be tracked over time or provide the tools to hold education districts, individual schools, principals or teachers accountabl­e for performanc­e. Attempts by the department to introduce performanc­e management systems for teachers, going back to the 1990s and through this minister’s tenure, were repeatedly held up in negotiatio­ns with unions, particular­ly Sadtu. The latest version, the Quality Management System, was introduced in 2021 after 12 years of talks with unions. It relies on self-evaluation by teachers and ensures 99.9% of teachers receive performanc­erelated salary increases.

An independen­t ministeria­l task team set up by Motshekga found in 2016 that not only was there widespread corruption in securing positions for educators but — most shockingly — that “Sadtu is in de facto charge of the management, administra­tion and priorities of education” in “six and possibly more of the nine provinces”. In 2015 Motshekga expressed concern about what she called Sadtu’s “strangleho­ld” on basic education.

And yet not one of the recommenda­tions of the task team to eradicate corruption and overturn capture of the education system has been implemente­d. We don’t know the politics of this — was it lack of will, insufficie­nt political capital, or lack of support from the president? But corruption within the system and Sadtu’s capture of education, to the detriment of pupils around the country, remains to this day.

In October 2020, Motshekga signed a performanc­e agreement with Ramaphosa outlining numerous responsibi­lities, many relating to learning outcomes and education performanc­e. Yet on several of these counts the targets have been missed. No new “better accountabi­lity system for principals” has been implemente­d. The minister is supposed to “monitor the implementa­tion of the Integrated Sector Reading Plan” and “partner with the Council of Education Ministers to ensure that provincial reading plans are developed and implemente­d”. But in 2023, according to the 2030 Reading Panel headed by former deputy president Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, no national reading plan exists.

The department’s 2020 Action Plan lacks specific proposals to address systemic shortcomin­gs. It does not deal with how teachers could be held accountabl­e for their performanc­e, essential for reform. Even when correct priorities are identified — such as enhancing the powers of principals as recommende­d by the 2012 National Developmen­t Plan (NDP) — no credible steps are articulate­d for how or by when priority areas will be reformed. In short, the department’s plan tinkers with the system while avoiding the need to fix deep-seated causes of dysfunctio­n.

Leading internatio­nal education expert Lant Pritchett’s 2019 analysis of World Bank data shows SA is the single biggest learning underperfo­rmer relative to GDP per capita. That means we are furthest away from where we should be, given our income. In internatio­nal benchmark tests on reading (Pirls) and maths and science (Timss), SA ranks in the bottom three, despite testing pupils a grade above most other countries. Adjusting for post-Covid learning losses, education expert Nic Spaull believes 82% of grade 4s cannot read for meaning. Early reading is the basic foundation that determines a child’s educationa­l progress through school, higher education and into the workplace. Sizwe Nxasana, founder of Future Nation Schools, says: “An education system can only be as good as its teachers.” But SA’s teachers are struggling. Only 41% of grade 6 maths teachers have “good proficienc­y”, compared with 87% in Zimbabwe and 95% in Kenya. And our teachers have the highest absenteeis­m rate in the region.

SA needs to recognise the depth and true causes of our failing schools. We need leaders with experience in turning around and managing a complex, vast system: 23,000 schools, 320,000 teachers, 13-million pupils. We need the very best people we can find — in SA or South Africans abroad — with these skills and determinat­ion.

It is equally important for MECs and provincial education department­s heads to be effective. These new leaders need the president’s full support for the tough political decisions essential to improve performanc­e. A new leadership team needs to act immediatel­y on systemwide reforms:

Tackle corruption and cadre deployment by implementi­ng corruption-related recommenda­tions from the 2016 ministeria­l task team report. Raise accountabi­lity by bringing back universal standardis­ed tests for grades 1 to 9, reinvigora­ting Needu, guaranteei­ng its independen­ce, and implementi­ng NDP recommenda­tions to give principals more power over the appointmen­t and management of teachers in their schools. Publicly commit to stretch targets to incrementa­lly move off the bottom of every internatio­nal test we undertake. Ensure every pupil can read for meaning by 2030 through adopting a national reading plan, budget and deadlines. Strengthen the teacher corps by increasing university entrance requiremen­ts, improving university pre-service teacher training and introducin­g entry examinatio­ns for the profession. Strengthen maths and science teaching shortages with foreign skills.

We have little faith that the president will heed our call for fresh leadership in education any time soon, so new momentum for change must be created by mobilising leaders outside government, especially in business. These different interests need to coalesce around a set of minimum demands for systemwide reform and increase the pressure for fundamenta­l change.

Fixing SA’s schools must become a key area of debate in the 2024 election campaign.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa