EU to consider formal talks about Ukraine membership
The EU’s 27 leaders could decide at a summit this week whether to launch formal membership talks with Ukraine, a step that would provide a much-needed boost for Kyiv amid uncertainty over the future of vital wartime foreign assistance.
Brussels offered Kyiv candidate status four months after Moscow’s February 2022 invasion, prompting a rush by Ukrainian authorities to reform priority areas identified by the European Commission.
In its November 8 assessment, the European Commission praised Ukraine’s progress and recommended that EU leaders launch negotiations, but singled out several tasks to complete. It also outlined a broader set of reforms spanning virtually every sector of governance for Ukraine to pursue over the coming year as it prepares for potential membership.
The commission reported last month that Ukraine had fulfilled four of its seven recommendations, including hiring anti-corruption officials, preparing the judiciary for a major overhaul and aligning media legislation with EU standards.
Most recommendations were aimed at shoring up the rule of law, key to rooting out a Soviet legacy of graft and mismanagement.
The commission, which suggested the remaining three conditions be met before talks were formally launched, said it would assess Ukraine’s progress again in March 2024.
By last Friday, legislators had passed legislation to meet virtually every one — including expanding the National AntiCorruption Bureau and protecting minority rights — even though that timing was not explicitly required.
SKIP DECISION
Leonid Litra, of the New Europe Center think-tank in Kyiv, said Ukraine’s rapid progress is aimed at keeping Kyiv “on the safe side” by providing sceptics as few excuses as possible to block Ukraine’s bid.
Hungary, in particular, has criticised Kyiv’s treatment of ethnic Hungarians in the far west of the country, and its leader, Viktor Orban, has demanded the EU skip any decision on Ukraine’s membership talks at the December 14-15 gathering. Despite the commission’s support, any decision requires the unanimous backing of EU leaders.
Accomplishing these shortterm tasks is just a fraction of the sweeping policy changes the commission has recommended Ukraine make across a variety of sectors, from public administration to food safety, by end-2024.
Regarding anticorruption, for instance, officials need to prove the fight against graft is “systemic and irrevocable” in part by ensuring the independence of specialised investigators and prosecutors.
Authorities must also intensify their crackdown on largescale illegal smuggling and improve asset recovery — on top of implementing a “time-bound and measurable action plan” to reform law enforcement more broadly.
In the economic realm, officials are expected to cut red tape and reintegrate displaced Ukrainians into the labour market, among other measures, as foreign investors prepare to help rebuild Ukraine.
That is in addition to a wide range of more granular measures such as improving state statistics collection and harmonising intellectual property rights protection with that of the EU.
GRUELLING PROCESS
Katarina Mathernova, the EU’s ambassador to Ukraine, described the challenge ahead in blunt terms.
“I have news for you: get used to it,” she said during a briefing in Kyiv last month, referring to the many requirements Kyiv will need to meet. “The enlargement process is a gruelling one.”
Political challenges lie ahead, too, with Hungary emerging as the bloc’s top critic of Ukraine’s membership bid. European officials say another summit might be needed early next year if Orban sticks to his insistence against talks and additional financial support for Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Kyiv’s window to push ahead with reforms may be narrow, some others have said.
One European diplomat in Kyiv, speaking on condition of anonymity, believes it will be crucial for Ukraine to demonstrate steady progress to help sustain what may become flagging enthusiasm within the EU.
Litra, of the New Europe Centre, said the Western Balkans’ protracted membership process shows accession is not always merit-based and equally dependent on intrabloc politics.
“We need all the stars to align.”