Biden climate funds tussle hots up
• Republican legislators’ efforts for reallocation of smart-farm benefits may damage Trump-supporting states, analysis shows
An effort by Republican legislators to reallocate $18bn in climate-friendly agriculture funding under US President Joe Biden’s signature climate law would shift money away from programmes that primarily benefit farmers in Republicanleaning states, a Reuters analysis has found.
The Inflation Reduction Act money, earmarked for department of agriculture-designated “climate-smart” farm practices, is intended to support Biden’s agriculture climate agenda, which relies heavily on storing carbon in the soil and lowering emissions through sustainable farming techniques.
About 65% of the new money due to be spent under the law on those climate-friendly practices would go to farmers in states that backed Republican former president Donald Trump in the 2020 election. About 70% would go to states with a Republican member on the House of Representatives or Senate farm committees, according to a Reuters examination of projections by University of Illinois agricultural policy professor Jonathan Coppess.
Iowa stands to get the most money with $1.03bn, followed by Texas ($772m) and Arkansas ($723m), according to the projections by Coppess, which used historical department of agriculture funding data to estimate how the Inflation Reduction Act money would be distributed.
Republican agriculture committee chair Glenn Thompson in the House of Representatives and the Senate agriculture committee’s top Republican, John Boozman, want to reallocate the Inflation Reduction Act money to all-conservation programmes without the climate-related requirements.
Under Thompson’s plan, some money would also be moved to crop supports and other farm programmes, a committee aide said.
A spokesperson for Thompson expressed scepticism towards the findings of Coppess
ABOUT 65% OF THE NEW MONEY [FOR] CLIMATE-FRIENDLY PRACTICES WOULD GO TO FARMERS IN STATES THAT BACKED TRUMP IN 2020
and noted that he previously served as general counsel for the Senate agriculture committee under Democratic leadership. Representatives for both Thompson and Boozman said reallocating the funds could allow money to reach more farmers.
Democrats are opposed to the reallocation. “Moving this funding away from conservation with its intended purpose — addressing the climate crisis — is a nonstarter for me and does not have the votes in the Senate or the House,” Democratic Senate agriculture committee chair Debbie Stabenow said.
White House officials have also pledged a fight to preserve the money for climate-friendly practices.
Though Democrats control the Senate and White House, the typically bipartisan process of negotiating the farm bill — a package passed every five years to fund commodity, conservation and nutrition programmes — often involves compromise.
The dispute over the Inflation Reduction Act money could further delay progress on the overdue bill. The farm bill that was passed in 2018 expired on September 30, and was extended for one year in November’s spending deal.
The farm committees are still drafting their versions of the next bill.
The climate-friendly agriculture money would go to programmes whose demand typically far exceeds their available funds. For instance, the department of agriculture in 2021 funded 29.9% of applications for its Environmental Quality Incentives Program, which funds practices that increase soil health, reduce erosion and mitigate drought, according to the department’s most recent data.
That programme received nearly $9bn for Inflation Reduction Act climate-smart farming grants.
Agriculture generates about 10% of US greenhouse gas emissions, from fertiliser application, livestock manure and tilling land for crops, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.