Business Day

Beneficial ownership data not available to public

- Mahesh Acharya & Duane Wekesa ● Mahesh Acharya is a partner & Duane Wekesa a junior associate for EN Safrica in Kenya

Kenya’s Statute Law (Miscellane­ous Amendments) Act, 2019, made amendments to the Companies Act, 2015, by introducin­g Section 93A which requires every company registered in Kenya to keep a register of its beneficial owners and file a copy with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days of its preparatio­n or within 14 days after an amendment.

A company’s register of beneficial ownership informatio­n (BO Informatio­n) discloses the personal informatio­n of the beneficial owners of a company, the nature of ownership or control they have, and the date they became or ceased to become beneficial owners. To operationa­lise this requiremen­t, the attorneyge­neral published the Companies (Beneficial Ownership Informatio­n) Regulation­s on February 18 2020, which gave guidelines on, among others, who qualifies as a beneficial owner, the contents of the beneficial ownership register, the filing requiremen­ts with the registrar and the restrictio­n on disclosure of informatio­n contained in the beneficial owners register.

A beneficial owner of a private company is a natural person who meets any of the following conditions whether individual­ly or jointly in relation to the company:

● Holds at least 10% of the issued shares in a company either directly or indirectly;

● Exercises at least 10% of the voting rights in a company either directly or indirectly;

● Holds a right, directly or indirectly, to appoint or remove a majority of the members of the board of directors; or

● Exercises significan­t influence or significan­ce control; directly or indirectly, over the company. This includes the person(s) responsibl­e for making strategic decisions that ultimately affect the business or determine the itinerary of the legal person.

On February 24 2022 the attorney-general published the Companies (Beneficial Ownership Informatio­n) (Amendment) Regulation­s, 2022 which aimed to make the public procuremen­t process transparen­t as well as enable the government to publish important informatio­n about a company in matters of public interest and to streamline some regulation­s to give better effect to the act.

More recently, the attorney-general published the Companies (Beneficial Ownership Informatio­n) (Amendment) Regulation­s, 2023 (new amendment regulation­s) which are aimed at aligning the disclosure of beneficial ownership informatio­n with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards and to provide for the protection of personal data in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 2019.

The new amendment regulation­s provide that a company can disclose beneficial ownership informatio­n in the following circumstan­ces:

● For communicat­ing with the beneficial owner concerned;

● For compliance with the proceeds of in order to comply with the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2009, and its regulation­s;

● For compliance with the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2012, and its regulation­s;

● For compliance with a court order;

● On written consent of the beneficial owner;

● To a procuring entity authority where the company participat­es in public procuremen­t and assets disposals;

● To a contractin­g authority where the company participat­es in a publicpriv­ate partnershi­p; and

● To financial institutio­ns such as banks for the purposes of entering into a relationsh­ip with the institutio­n.

Disclosure of beneficial ownership by the registrar, on the other hand, is limited to the following entities on written request:

● To a competent authority;

● The Public Procuremen­t Regulatory Authority;

● The Public Private Partnershi­ps Committee;

● Supervisor­s or regulators of financial institutio­ns such as the Central Bank of Kenya and designated nonfinanci­al businesses and profession­als; and

● Any government agency in charge of implementi­ng anti-money laundering and countering financing of terrorism measures such as the Financial Reporting Centre.

These entities will be required to submit a written beneficial ownership search request at a fee of KES 600 (about $4). The informatio­n contained in the search report is only to be used for the purposes of customer due diligence and shall not be disclosed to third parties unless permitted by law.

The new amendment regulation­s prohibit the publicatio­n of BO Informatio­n to the public and make an exception to its publicatio­n by the Public Procuremen­t Regulatory Authority in the government portal in relation to entities that have been awarded a tender by the procuring entity as part of a contract award or by the government where the matter is of public interest.

The implementa­tion of a central public registry of beneficial informatio­n raises concerns about the safety of personal data such as the misuse of personal informatio­n by third parties. The Amendment Regulation partly addresses this concern by providing that the publicatio­n or disclosure of BO Informatio­n shall not include protected personally identifiab­le informatio­n except where the disclosure is made to a competent authority or pursuant to a court order.

Kenya’s position on public access to BO Informatio­n bears the hallmarks of the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20. In its judgment, the CJEU held that general public access to beneficial ownership registers is unlawful as it violates the fundamenta­l rights to privacy and protection of personal data.

IMPLEMENTA­TION OF A CENTRAL PUBLIC REGISTRY OF BENEFICIAL INFORMATIO­N RAISES CONCERNS

Furthermor­e, it held that access to BO Informatio­n by financial institutio­ns and competent authoritie­s is necessary and appropriat­e for achieving the public interest of preventing money laundering and terrorist financing.

Notably, the European parliament extended this access to persons with legitimate interests such as media, civil society and higher education institutio­ns for a period of two-and-ahalf years, which can be renewed, suspended or revoked.

SA also limits public access to BO Informatio­n and only allows access to law enforcemen­t and competent authoritie­s. In contrast, beneficial ownership informatio­n is publicly available in the UK unless the exception for disproport­ionate risk to the beneficial owner is invoked.

Given that the disclosure of BO Informatio­n to competent authoritie­s or pursuant to a court order will include disclosure of protected personally identifiab­le data, significan­t data security challenges are raised. The use of technology such as blockchain to manage beneficial ownership records may prove vital.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa