Business Day

EU raises concern over Boeing safety approvals

- Joanna Plucinska and Tim Hepher

The acting head of Europe’s aviation regulator said on Wednesday the agency would halt its indirect approval of Boeing’s jet production if warranted, but he feels reassured that the planemaker is tackling its latest safety crisis.

In an interview with Reuters, the EU Aviation Safety Agency’s (EASA) acting executive director, Luc Tytgat, gave the first public indication that internatio­nal cooperatio­n underpinni­ng global airplane production was being tested by the ongoing crisis as it rarely has been.

Asked if EASA would be prepared to stop recognisin­g US production safety approvals declaring that Boeing jets are built safely, Tytgat said, “If need be, yes”.

Boeing has been under mounting pressure over factory quality control since January 5, when a door plug tore off a 737 MAX 9 jet in mid-air in an incident blamed on missing bolts.

The US Federal Aviation Administra­tion (FAA) said last week an audit of Boeing and supplier Spirit AeroSystem­s found multiple instances of poor controls.

Under a transatlan­tic pact, the FAA and EASA regulate the factories of their respective planemaker­s — Boeing and Airbus — and recognise each other’s safety approvals.

However, if one side loses confidence in the other’s compliance checks, it can call for consultati­ons and, if those fail, suspend recognitio­n after a pause of 30 days.

“All the tools must be implementa­ble as soon as we see the justificat­ion or situation that requires us to take appropriat­e measures,” Tytgat said, adding no such action was imminent.

FATAL ACCIDENTS

EASA’s influence over the design of Boeing planes has grown following the MAX crashes, but the regulator has relatively few ways to increase its monitoring of the production of existing Boeing models other than the drastic option of suspending recognitio­n.

Pressed on what would push EASA to go that far, Tytgat said, speaking only for himself, “More fatal accidents in the future”.

The FAA did not comment directly on the EASA remarks but a spokespers­on reiterated the agency’s earlier statements that Boeing must commit to “real and profound improvemen­ts”. Boeing did not comment. But Tytgat did not see any immediate threat to Boeing’s production certificat­ion.

“We don’t see why [it] cannot be maintained today. It is more [about] the oversight and monitoring conditions that are in place.”

Tytgat said that he held discussion­s with senior Boeing executives on Friday that were reassuring. “I have seen a change in the management. They put a lot of weight on quality controls, product quality and I was really reassured about the willingnes­s of the top management to change ... production quality control,” he said.

The FAA has invited EASA to attend an audit of Boeing plants as an observer later this year, the European agency said. But Tytgat ruled out a permanent presence, saying it would “not be in the spirit” of the transatlan­tic safety agreement.

FAA administra­tor Mike Whitaker said on Monday that the agency would take action if it saw a reason to halt Boeing production.

A decision by either of the world’s two most powerful aviation regulators to upend production approval of Boeing or Airbus jets would take the safety crisis into uncharted territory and likely stir political reactions, experts said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa