Japan warns on Oz dominance
• The enlarged group could become too dominant in the global supply of coking coal if it goes ahead with a takeover, say executives
Japanese steelmakers have voiced concern with Australian authorities that BHP Group could become too dominant in the global supply of coking coal if it takes over Anglo American. Australia is the world’s biggest exporter of coking coal and top supplier to Japan, accounting for about 60% of its imports. Most of the steelmaking ingredient comes from the state of Queensland, where BHP and Anglo American are the two biggest producers. Steelmakers’ concern about BHP’s coking coal market power could derail a deal if the Australian giant comes back with a revised bid for Anglo American, after its $39bn offer was rebuffed in April.
Japanese steelmakers have voiced concern with Australian authorities that BHP Group could become too dominant in the global supply of coking coal if it takes over Anglo American.
Australia is the world’s biggest exporter of coking coal and top supplier to Japan, accounting for about 60% of its imports. Most of the steelmaking ingredient comes from the state of Queensland, where BHP and Anglo American are the two biggest producers.
Steelmakers’ concern about BHP’s coking coal market power could derail a deal if the Australian giant comes back with a revised bid for Anglo American, after its $39bn offer was rebuffed in April.
“BHP already has a large share of the supply of high-quality hard coking coal in the seaborne trade, and we will take measures to ensure that further oligopolisation will not impede sound price formation and stable supply,” said a JFE Steel spokesperson, who declined to elaborate on what measures they could take.
Representatives of Japanese steelmakers met Queensland government officials expressing concern that if a deal went ahead it would concentrate the world’s top quality coking coal mines in the state’s Bowen Basin in the hands of BHP, said two people familiar with the talks.
The combined group would control 44-million tonnes, or about 13%, of the seaborne coking coal market, data from consultants Wood Mackenzie shows. This is despite BHP’s production having fallen after sales of some mines in recent years.
“In general, we are against the [BHP-Anglo] union as it would create a supplier with a huge market share, especially in the hard-coking coal market,” said a source at a Japanese steelmaker, which is monitoring the situation closely.
“We would not want BHP to buy Anglo and gain a stronger price competition power.”
Queensland deputy premier and treasurer Cameron Dick said that BHP would need to ensure its coal remains competitive or risk losing state government support.
“We work closely with our Japanese customers and are aware of their concerns,” said Dick.
“BHP needs to explain to Japanese steelmakers and the market more broadly how it will ensure the ongoing supply of steelmaking coal remains competitive,” he said.
BHP declined to comment, but it has said that expanding in high quality coking coal was a main driver of its tilt for Anglo.
Anglo American declined to comment. Japan’s Fair Trade Commission has the authority to investigate a BHP-Anglo American transaction and could block a deal if it were found to harm Japanese companies, said two antitrust lawyers in Tokyo.
However, if a deal was considered to be anticompetitive, the commission was likely to ask BHP to offer a remedy, which could include a coal divestment, said one of the two lawyers. Both of them declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue.
The Fair Trade Commission declined to comment whether it has received any request to examine the BHP-Anglo deal.
Like JFE, Kobe Steel said that it was keeping a close eye on the proposed deal and a potential increase in BHP’s market power. Nippon Steel, Japan’s biggest steelmaker, declined to comment on the deal, but said that it had expressed concern to the Queensland government that its royalty rate hike could result in lower investment in mines and disrupt coking coal supply in the future.
Key among the issues of concern of steelmakers is that BHP has stressed it will not invest to expand production in Queensland after the state increased coal royalties without industry consultation, said a source familiar with the matter.
BHP CEO Mike Henry said last year that his company “will not be investing any further growth dollars in Queensland under the current conditions”.
MOUNTING COMPETITION
Anglo’s Moranbah North and Grosvenor mines are effectively an extension of BHP’s Goonyella mine, which produces a type of coal that is favoured by Japan and India.
The Japanese are facing mounting competition from India for that coal.
BHP already sends 40% of its coking coal to India, and expects that country’s demand for the steelmaking ingredient to double by the end of the decade, CFO Vandita Pant said in March.
Japan could lobby antitrust authorities in other jurisdictions to block a deal if it believes that there will be an effect on the competitiveness of the global coking market — as it did when BHP made a bid for its iron ore rival Rio Tinto in 2007, said one of the lawyers.
Queensland could also complicate a deal.
“The transfer of mineral assets in Queensland are subject to a number of state government approvals. No resources company should take those approvals for granted,” Dick said.
WE WOULD NOT WANT BHP TO BUY ANGLO AND GAIN A STRONGER PRICE COMPETITION POWER