Cape Argus

Anti-graft pledge to show who owns companies

-

LONDON: Countries from Britain to Afghanista­n pledged yesterday to set up public registers of company ownership in a collective effort to make it harder to launder the proceeds of corruption around the globe.

British Prime Minister David Cameron announced the measure at the start of a global anti-corruption summit he is hosting in London, but critics said the proposed registers may not make a significan­t impact unless tax havens also ended secrecy.

The build-up to the event was marred by Cameron being caught on camera describing Nigeria and Afghanista­n, which are both taking part, as “fantastica­lly corrupt”, but he later said that the leaders of both countries were tackling the problem.

US secretary of state John Kerry, addressing a plenary session at the summit, said corruption was as much of an enemy as some of the extremists who Washington was fighting.

“It is a contributo­r to terrorism in many different ways, and the extremism that we see in the world today comes to no small degree from the utter exasperati­on that people have with the sense that the system is rigged,” Kerry said.

“We see this anger manifestin­g itself in different forms in elections around the world, including ours,” he said, alluding to the unexpected success of Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Bernie Sanders in the US presidenti­al primaries.

France, the Netherland­s, Nigeria and Afghanista­n would join Britain in launching public registers of true company ownership, Cameron’s office said. Kerry said the US had already announced steps to improve transparen­cy on business ownership. More could follow in the course of the summit.

Cameron’s office said that any foreign company that owns a property in Britain or wants to buy one or to bid for a central government contract would have to join the new register.

The aim is to expose those who hide behind obscure shell companies to own properties, a particular­ly acute problem in London which has been hit by scandals involving luxury homes owned by corrupt foreign politician­s and businesspe­ople.

Some critics said the impact of the registers might be limited unless tax havens were also forced to open up about who owned offshore-registered companies.

“I can’t tell until I’ve seen the detail whether this is a PR stunt or a serious policy which will reveal the true ownership of properties here in the UK,” said Margaret Hodge, a member of parliament from the opposition Labour Party who specialise­s in these issues.

The release of the “Panama Papers”, leaked documents from law firm Mossack Fonseca, put tax avoidance at the top of the global agenda by showing the extent to which tax havens were used by politician­s and businesspe­ople from around the world.

Anti-graft protesters who gathered close to the summit venue, some dressed as bankers with bowler hats reclining on deck chairs as they fanned themselves with banknotes, said what was needed was an outright abolition of tax havens.

“We just think this has got to the point where ending tax havens has to be done. They serve no useful economic purpose,” said Sally Copley, head of UK campaigns at charity Oxfam.

The British Virgin Islands, a British territory that the Panama Papers suggested was home to more than half of the 200 000 companies set up by Mossack Fonseca, was not represente­d at the summit. –Reuters

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa