Generalisations won’t do
THE narrative in a recent editorial in the Cape Argus, as well as the slant in a preceding article about lower-income residents in Woodstock who, it is claimed, are essentially being driven out of the area due to a massive spike in rates charges, refers.
The writings are based on generalisations and a clear lack of vetted information as to the specific rates accounts of the residents that the newspaper makes reference to.
The increase in value of the properties, as well as the substantial indigent and rates relief that is offered to those who truly are vulnerable and unable to afford rates and service charges, are also not taken into account.
In general, ways that the City enables relief for vetted low-income and indigent residents in the area would include rates rebates and indigent relief.
For instance, looking at information in the previous financial year as at June 30, 2016, Salt River had 1 989 registered properties listed as having residents who are senior citizens and people with special needs who receive rates rebates.
While in Woodstock, 4 967 properties were listed as having senior citizens and people with special needs who receive rates rebates.
The City actively searches out qualifying residents in this area, and across the metro, and always encourages struggling residents to approach us to see if they qualify.
In general, lower-income property owners in the near inner-city areas, as is the case with the rest of the metro, are subsidised by the City in an effort to enable them to retain their homes if they qualify and to assist them with the cost of living.
Low-income households, in addition, receive a substantial package of social assistance.
COUNCILLOR JOHAN VAN DER MERWE Mayoral Committee Member for Finance City of Cape Town