Cape Argus

Aspiration­s grounded as land reform plans erode

Inter-department­al co-operation isn’t working and funds are scarce

- Ken Robertson

TO ENSURE transforma­tion and access to economic opportunit­y, South Africans are alive to the fact that a just and efficient land claims process is a critical first step. Decades of dispossess­ion and displaceme­nt by the apartheid government, through its discrimina­tory laws, saw vast communitie­s removed from land they had lived on for generation­s.

It is not enough for the ANC government to keep making reference to the fact that it has taken steps to set up structures and systems to reverse these unequal land ownership patterns. We are aware of the role and responsibi­lities of the Department of Rural Developmen­t and Land Reform and the Commission on Restitutio­n of Land Rights. What is missing in the ANC government’s narrative is why the land reform and restitutio­n process has been moving at a snail’s pace.

In certain instances, the Department of Rural Developmen­t and Land Reform and the Commission on Restitutio­n of Land Rights are required to work with other government department­s, such as the Department of Public Works (DPW), to navigate cases where some of the land identified for reclamatio­n by claimants is owned by these department­s.

Available evidence, however, indicates the ANC is reluctant to acknowledg­e that inter-department­al co-operation on land claims resolution is not working. Poor co-operation between government department­s has created impediment­s that has seen land claim beneficiar­ies wait for years to receive their claims or financial compensati­on.

In one case brought to the attention of the DA, the Adriaanse family in the Western Cape lodged a claim in 1998 for 96 hectares of land from which they were forcefully removed by the apartheid government in 1969. In 2013, the Commission on Restitutio­n of Land Rights awarded them the claim.

But because the claim was in an area earmarked for the extension of the Cape Town Internatio­nal Airport, the Department of Rural Developmen­t and Land Reform recommende­d the claimant be paid out to the value of the property or be awarded alternativ­e state land.

The claimants rejected an offer of R2.65 million and opted for alternativ­e state land, as they considered their original claim was worth much more than they were being offered. In 2016, 18 years after they lodged their claim, the DPW informed them that the department lacked the resources to complete the transactio­n.

The Adriaanse case is of one of many which partly explain why the land restitutio­n process, as spearheade­d by the ANC, has been slow and only a few cases have been satisfacto­rily settled to date. It’s unacceptab­le as it militates against efforts aimed at redress and access to economic opportunit­y.

Often, the failure by government department­s to co-operate and settle land claims brought by the Commission on Restitutio­n of Land Rights can be attributed to the mismanagem­ent and maladminis­tration within these department­s.

In 2016, the auditor-general indicated that mismanagem­ent of funds by the Property Management Trading Entity, which falls under the Department of Public Works and manages the department’s immoveable assets including land, continues to impede its ability to function effectivel­y.

The 2016/17 auditor-general’s findings concluded that the Property Management Trading Entity’s asset liabilitie­s exceeded R8.8 billion over and above the R3.7 billion the department had spent on irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditur­e. These figures are indicative of a culture of impunity in the ANC government where poor internal financial control measures, lacklustre revenue and expenditur­e management and general maladminis­tration are the order of the day.

This begs the question: how can the ANC government expect to expedite the land claims process if national department­s under its management have financial books that are always in the red?

The DA strongly condemns the violation of land claimants’ rights due to gross mismanagem­ent and maladminis­tration of state resources by government department­s.

We cannot continue to have a situation where families are left in limbo because the ANC government is failing to return land that belongs to them or to offer fair compensati­on for an asset that belongs to them.

Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Rural Developmen­t and Land Reform must take immediate steps to come up with a policy framework for inter-department­al co-operation to ensure land claims are processed timeously and effectivel­y. It must ensure the red tape that often impedes the Commission on Restitutio­n of Land Rights when it tries to settle claims is minimised.

Removing glaring inequaliti­es in society requires boldness in confrontin­g the land question.

It must not be business as usual as we work to find urgent solutions to this urgent issue.

As one of the MPs on the Portfolio Committee on Rural Developmen­t and Land Reform, I commit to ensuring that inter-department­al lethargy over land claims is addressed urgently.

 ?? PICTURE: SIPHIWE SIBEKO ?? THWARTED: Land reform is an urgent issue requiring urgent solutions to allow more people access to economic opportunit­y, according to the writer.
PICTURE: SIPHIWE SIBEKO THWARTED: Land reform is an urgent issue requiring urgent solutions to allow more people access to economic opportunit­y, according to the writer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa