Cape Argus

City still delivering services

No plans for city to be placed under administra­tion

- Jason Felix

STUNG by allegation­s of maladminis­tration and corruption, a divided caucus and the prospects of running out of water, the City of Cape Town will not be placed under administra­tion just yet. Local government MEC Anton Bredell said there were no plans to place the City under administra­tion because the municipali­ty was still stable.

The ANC in Cape Town said they have plans to write to Des van Rooyen, Minister of Co-operative Governance and Traditiona­l Affairs, to place the City under administra­tion. Bredell however said the process was not so easy.

“One must remember that a municipali­ty can only be placed under administra­tion if they are not delivering services. As things stand now, the City of Cape Town is stable and delivering services, despite what might be going on in the political front,” he said.

The drama started when Melissa Whitehead, executive director for transport, was found guilty of nepotism for hiring two friends. It was further alleged that Whitehead was involved in unfairly advantagin­g a Chinese company, BYD, to secure a multimilli­on-rand tender to manufactur­e 11 electric buses. The allegation­s came after the reports that Whitehead threatened and coerced members of the city’s bid evaluation committee for the Foreshore freeway precinct to award the tender to a particular­ly entity.

Whitehead denied the allegation­s and claimed that the city’s employment and tender processes had been followed. The City also suffered losses of R36 million from its MyCiTi bus service due to theft from staffers. She was suspended by council a few weeks ago.

Mayor Patricia de Lille has also come under fire when councillor­s within her caucus complained about her leadership style, and made serious allegation­s of nepotism against De Lille. More recently a Gauteng businessma­n claimed that De Lille solicited a R5m bribe in order for him to get a tender. De Lille has denied this.

Last week De Lille survived a no-confidence motion by a whisker with the help of opposition parties and some DA councillor­s who voted for her. The motion was tabled by the DA.

Section 139 (1) (b) of the constituti­on gives the provincial government powers to dissolve the council when a municipali­ty cannot or does not fulfil its constituti­onal obligation. It also gives the provinces powers to appoint an administra­tor until a new council has been elected. This section states that when a municipali­ty does not fulfil an obligation, the provincial executive may take appropriat­e steps to correct the situation.

Bredell explained that the process can be time-consuming.

“I first have to receive a complaint. Then I will have to write to the City to provide me with reasons as to why I should not take steps to place them under administra­tion. Before I can invoke section 139 of the constituti­on, I have to go to the national minister and during this time the City could have approached the court on this matter. So it’s a very tedious process,” he said.

A MUNICIPALI­TY CAN ONLY BE PLACED UNDER ADMINISTRA­TION IF THEY ARE NOT DELIVERING SERVICES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa