Cape Argus

Stratcom style tricks laid bare

Campaign to torpedo Sagarmatha listing on JSE

- Staff Writers

INDEPENDEN­T Media has evidence that senior executives of its competitor Tiso Blackstar had plotted to torpedo Sagarmatha Technologi­es’ listing on the JSE. The evidence specifical­ly alludes to attempts to influence critical stakeholde­rs to stop the listing due to Independen­t Media’s involvemen­t in Sagarmatha.

The evidence points to a dirty tricks campaign akin to Stratcom which the apartheid regime’s security apparatus used to demonise Struggle icon Winnie Madikizela-Mandela – but in this instance, the campaign was aimed at Independen­t Media and its executive chairman, Dr Iqbal Survé.

The JSE approved the Pre-Listing Statement of Sagarmatha on March 28. On April 3, and for the next few weeks, Tiso Blackstar launched a series of articles to deliberate­ly misreprese­nt the financial position of Independen­t Media as “technicall­y insolvent”, the company said in statements.

Tiso Blackstar – formerly Times Media Group (TMG), is a direct competitor of Independen­t Media and publishes Sunday Times, Business Day, Sowetan and the online news platform TimesLive.

Business Day outgoing editor Tim Cohen revealed Tiso Blackstar’s motive in his column written after the JSE stopped the listing by suggesting that the Public Investment Corporatio­n (PIC) should force a merger between Tiso Blackstar and Independen­t Media.

Ahead of the listing, Independen­t Media said the PIC was unduly pressured by journalist­s from Tiso Blackstar, Daily Maverick and Amabhungan­e. The PIC eventually succumbed to pressure and declined to invest in Sagarmatha.

Sagarmatha Technologi­es said in a statement that despite the PIC’s withdrawal, it managed to raise R4.2 billion – easily satisfying the onerous listing requiremen­ts by the JSE. The normal listing requiremen­t is R500 million, but the JSE insisted on a R3bn requiremen­t.

Cohen’s opinion piece followed of a slew of correspond­ence by journalist­s in Tiso Blackstar employ directed to advisors, regulators and the PIC. The PIC has revealed it wasn’t investing in Sagarmatha shortly after the listing was withdrawn.

On April 13, the day Sagarmatha Technologi­es was supposed to list, Cohen wrote: “The PIC needs to start thinking about forcing a merger, otherwise a whole bunch of SA’s long-loved newspapers are going to to disappear pretty soon.”

Tiso Blackstar’s financial woes are well-documented. Its share price has fallen from R25 to R4 recently. This week it

de-listed from the London Stock Exchange.

Tiso Blackstar’s campaign included articles by Ann Crotty and Sam Sole, writing under the investigat­ion unit of AmaBhungan­e. Independen­t Media has highlighte­d 29 misleading inaccuraci­es about Crotty and Sole’s reporting on the listing – the most damaging being that Independen­t Media was “technicall­y insolvent”.

Independen­t Media has shareholde­r loans – all of whom have a residual interest in the business. Tiso Backstar has bank debt of more than R1.5bn.

Yesterday Dr Survé said it was eerie how this Tiso Blackstar campaign had been revealed in the week that Struggle legend Madikizela-Mandela was buried.

“Winnie Madikizela-Mandela, in one of the last appearance­s, spoke about Stratcom, and the head of Stratcom, Vic McPherson, indicated that at least 40 journalist­s were on the payroll of the apartheid state. Winnie was their principal target.

“The aim was to vilify Winnie so that her credibilit­y would be destroyed and she would have no influence in the course of the country’s future,” said Dr Survé.

News that Tiso Blackstar had actively attempted to scupper the listing sketched a pattern reminiscen­t of Stratcom’s tactics, he said.

Dr Survé said the dirty tricks campaigns extended to the profession­als and regulators involved in the listing, including advisers and auditors.

“The patterns that are emerging on the attacks on Independen­t Media and the Sekunjalo Group and myself reek of Stratcom. This has all the hallmarks of Stratcom and dirty tricks.

“First, in the words of McPherson, it was important to mix the truth with disinforma­tion and lies so that the story is believed by the reader. Winnie mentioned this was done in the ratio of 70% truth to 30% lies,” said Dr Survé.

He said there were commercial reasons but also political reasons Tiso Blackstar wanted to stop Independen­t Media. Independen­t Media offered a space to tell an alternativ­e narrative that otherwise wouldn’t exist, Dr Survé said.

Commenting on the Stratcom similariti­es, he said: “The past becomes the present to determine the future.”

Approached, Tiso Blackstar chief executive Andrew Bonamour denied he had asked his executives to stop Sagarmatha.

“No, not at all. Why would we do that?. We share distributi­on. Why would we want to harm the business?. We have no contact with the PIC and we have no contact with the JSE. Our journalist­s are totally independen­t. We have a strict policy. I have no interactio­n with the PIC. I can promise you now it is nothing.”

Asked to explain what he meant, Cohen said: “It’s my view that the newspaper industry needs consolidat­ion. The industry is not in a good shape.”

About the multiple misleading inaccuraci­es in the articles, including that Independen­t Media is “technicall­y insolvent”, Ann Crotty said: “I wrote based on the 212 pre-listing statement. It was an amazing amount of informatio­n.”

She denied harassing advisers and auditors. “How could I harass regulators? I think I did ask them (Vunani) about their involvemen­t about a week ago,” she said.

Said Sole: “It is not for me to respond now… Independen­t has already won. As far as I am aware, a point was made that Sekunjalo/Independen­t Media was technicall­y insolvent.

“Whether or not the position is the same with Independen­t Media, of which Sekunjalo is 55% shareholde­r, we do not know because we haven’t seen Independen­t Media figures.

“All I can say is there is not a great deal of detail that has been supplied in relation to what is allegedly incorrect in the article.”

TWENTY-four years ago South Africans voted in the country’s first democratic elections. A watershed, 1994 brought a sense of hope and patriotism to the nation.

In what was described as a miracle, South Africa stepped back from the brink of civil war. An immoral and racist regime had preceded democracy.

It’s ruthless security apparatus violated, tortured and killed activists whose desire was a better country. Apartheid’s security branch did not function on its own.

It had many tentacles and was aided and abetted by various elements. Apartheid also ensured transforma­tion of the business sector was non existent.

People of colour were denied opportunit­y to prosper.

Many achievemen­ts, economic and otherwise came post 1994. We’ve come a long way, but many hurdles still exist – one being transforma­tion. Correcting the wrongs of the past was never going to be a painless exercise or a walk in the park.

Today countless black-owned enterprise­s are run successful­ly despite the odds against them.

Transforma­tion comes to them naturally – naturally because their owners have a deep understand­ing of a South Africa pre-1994.

Importantl­y, these business are successful because in essence they function on honesty and sound business principles and ethics.

The same cannot be said of some white-owned businesses – Tiso Blackstar being an example.

What the leadership of this company did to torpedo the listing on the JSE of an opponent is nothing short of scandalous.

Yes, the business environmen­t is rough and robust, but employing tactics akin to apartheid’s security branch denies you the right to be respected as a business – just like apartheid denied black people their right to dignity.

Like apartheid’s security apparatus, Tiso Blackstar is also aided and abetted in it’s strategy of sowing disinforma­tion about an opponent whose transforma­tion track record is second to none. It illustrate­s how ethically poor it has become.

What will it take for business owners like Tiso Blackstar’s leadership to accept that this type of behaviour robs them of being respected by their peers?

It is because of they can’t accept that a competitor can be smarter?

Or is it because the opponent is black?

If the answer is yes on both counts, Tiso Blackstar’s owners will do well to accept these situations would not be changing.

They must examine their company’s moral bankruptcy.

They must also learn to accept that just like apartheid was wrong, brought sheer misery to its inventors, and failed, so is Tiso Blackstar’s dishonest campaign against a rival.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa