Cape Argus

Many jobs could be automated and SA is not prepared

- Daniel B. le Roux

BUSINESSES around the world are cottoning on to the value of transferri­ng labour from human workers to machines.

Automation can increase efficiency and decrease labour costs.

It helps employers to avoid complex challenges like wage increase demands, labour protests and strikes. Consumers also benefit from automation when products and services become cheaper because of reduced input costs.

But while there are numerous benefits to automation, recent economic trends in the developed world suggest that it may also be a key driver of economic inequality.

A growing body of scholars and thought leaders has warned that this new wave of the technologi­cal revolution could change the relationsh­ip between labour and capital in an unpreceden­ted manner.

Importantl­y, these modern Luddites are not necessaril­y anti-technology.

Their concern is with the way in which increasing­ly smart technologi­es exacerbate economic inequality.

It does this by devaluing low-skilled labour and hollowing out the middle class, as is evidenced by trends in productivi­ty and median household income in the US.

Limited work has been done to study the potential impact of automation on economies in the developing world. That’s what prompted me to investigat­e the situation in South Africa. I used data collected by Statistics South Africa for its quarterly Labour Force Survey and an automation index produced by academics from the University of Oxford. From this, I was able to estimate that occupation­s performed by almost 35% of South African workers – roughly 4.5 million people – are potentiall­y automatabl­e in the near future. South Africa is already one of the world’s most unequal economies. Its unemployme­nt rate hovers at around 27%.

It is also no stranger to labour protests and strikes, making automation an attractive option for managers and capital owners.

The data I worked with indicate that roughly 14 million South Africans work in around 380 different occupation types.

Sixty-four of these occupation­s, employing an estimated 3.6 million workers, have a 90% or greater probabilit­y of being automatabl­e. These occupation­s include, for example, cashiers, tellers, secretarie­s and telephone salesmen.

The occupation­s of another 2.6 million workers, of whom 900 000 are employed as farmhands and labourers, have an 80%89% probabilit­y of being automatabl­e.

Half of all black South Africa workers are in occupation­s with an 80% or greater probabilit­y of automation; so are 47% of coloured workers. For white employees, however, the proportion is only around 30%. Despite these risks, it seems likely that as an ever-expanding range of automation technologi­es enter the market, many South African business owners will seize the opportunit­y to limit their dependency on human labour.

But there seems to be very limited highlevel discourse about how South Africa plans to navigate this wave of technologi­cal advancemen­t. Elsewhere in the world, US presidenti­al candidate for 2020 Andrew Yang is building his entire campaign around this issue. He is promising to introduce Universal Basic Income, through which every American over the age of 18 years will receive $1 000 per month from the government. This, he believes, will provide security and enable mobility for workers displaced by automation.

For South Africa, with its large number of low-skilled workers, a dramatical­ly-improved education system is an obvious and critical concern. Despite high unemployme­nt, there remains a scarcity of skills in a wide variety of areas.

This suggests a mismatch between supply and demand in the labour market. It is also important to understand how technologi­es will displace work in future. This understand­ing can help to better inform young South Africans’ career choices.

HALF OF ALL BLACK WORKERS ARE IN OCCUPATION­S WITH AN 80% PROBABILIT­Y OF AUTOMATION

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa