Cape Argus

Alcohol at schools bill gets slammed

Clauses conflict with existing regulation in national act

- Jason Felix

THE DA-led provincial legislatur­e’s own legal counsel has advised against the adoption of the controvers­ial Western Cape Schools Education Amendment Bill that proposes the sale of liquor at schools under certain conditions, warning that it is in conflict with national legislatio­n.

The changes in the bill will mean that schools may permit the sale and consumptio­n of alcohol on public school premises or at school activities.

It also prescribes that pupils found guilty of serious misconduct may be sent to interventi­on facilities, the Education MEC may establish a school evaluation authority which will independen­tly evaluate schools and develop school evaluation reports, and provision has also been made for the establishm­ent of collaborat­ion schools and donor-funded schools.

But legislatur­e legal adviser Andre le Roux said the clauses in the bill were in conflict with existing regulation­s contained in the national Schools Act that deal with safety measures at public schools.

He prepared the legal opinion for the standing committee on education.

“The (national) regulation­s provide that no person may possess or use alcohol during any school activity. The regulation­s, in the definition­s clause, define ‘school activity’ as any educationa­l, cultural, sporting or social activity of the school, within or outside the premises,” Le Roux said.

He said clause 22 of the (provincial) bill, in short, provides for the lawful consumptio­n of alcohol, by a person other than a pupil, at a school activity that is held off school premises.

“Clause 23 of the bill provides for the consumptio­n or sale of alcohol on school premises or at any school activity held on school premises, under certain circumstan­ces. I am not of the view that the conflicts can be reconciled. The conflictin­g provisions appear fundamenta­lly at odds and are mutually exclusive,” Le Roux said.

National legislatio­n supersedes provincial laws.

Le Roux said: “Either the consumptio­n of alcohol during school activities is absolutely forbidden (as the national

act in its regulation­s clearly intend), or the consumptio­n of alcohol during school activities is permissibl­e under certain circumstan­ces. It does not appear as though these provisions can coexist, on a reasonable interpreta­tion, without conflict.”

On interventi­on facilities, Le Roux said: “The powers granted to the MEC is a plenary law making power, and is not structured or guided in a meaningful way. There is no formulatio­n, in respect of interventi­on facilities, of any meaningful policy and principle parameters, as one would ordinarily find in law.”

Education MEC Debbie Schäfer’s spokespers­on Jessica Shelver was on leave yesterday and said she would respond to questions today.

“The MEC is also on a flight and I need comment from her,” Shelver said.

ANC Western Cape education spokespers­on Theo Olivier said: “The DA’s attitude towards alcohol and (ab)use thereof is alarming in a province where excessive alcohol abuse is a very serious problem in many poor communitie­s. They will be hardest hit by this irresponsi­ble DA plan.”

DA provincial education spokespers­on Basil Kivedo called on residents to voice their concerns at public meeting in Paarl today.

Kivedo, also chairperso­n of the education standing committee, said the main objectives of the bill were to make provision for goods and services to be centrally procured and to regulate monitoring and support of curriculum delivery at public schools.

The SA Democratic Teachers Union reiterated that the proposed amendments were in contradict­ion with existing national legislatio­n and were unlikely to improve educationa­l outcomes.

 ??  ?? NO COMMENT: Debbie Schäfer
NO COMMENT: Debbie Schäfer

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa