Cape Argus

District Six twist

State expected to file answering papers on Friday

- Marvin Charles

THE DISTRICT Six land restitutio­n saga is beset by confusion about who is taking responsibi­lity for the settlement of the land claims. Part of the confusion is a court battle between the District Six working committee and the Department of Rural Developmen­t and Land Reform that has stalled after it emerged that the department had not responded to a court applicatio­n filed in April.

The applicatio­n was lodged in the Land Claims Court in Johannesbu­rg. The department was initially supposed to respond to the court applicatio­n in May but failed to do so.

“We always expected the government to oppose this. They were given until May 30 to file answering papers, but they did not. I have spoken to the state attorney and he understand­s the frustratio­n and he indicated that the answering papers will be filed this Friday,” law firm Norton Rose Fulbright director Nicki Van’t Riet said.

The committee filed a court applicatio­n against the department’s failure to provide restitutio­n to District Six claimants since 1998. It was stated in court papers that the national government and the commission have a constituti­onal obligation to observe the Bill of Rights, which includes the right to restitutio­n.The committee is representi­ng 969 claimants, with 22 respondent­s listed. Of the claimants, 70 are elderly.

Chairperso­n of the District Six working committee Shahied Ajam said: “We are not here to point fingers but what is wrong is wrong.”

Last week an “agreement” was reached between the provincial standing committee on human settlement­s and the Department of Rural Developmen­t to transfer the budget for District Six to the Provincial Department on Human Settlement.

But the department has backtracke­d on its plans to transfer the budget for the historic District Six area to the provincial department.

The standing committee chairperso­n, Matlhodi Maseko, said: “The department said in our first discussion on June 19 that the constructi­on company Fikile did a shoddy job and the challenge that the department has is that no company wants to take over the developmen­t.”

Department of Rural Developmen­t and Land Reform spokespers­on Phuti Mabelebele said: “The department is committed to resolving the District Six matters for the benefit of the people of District Six amicably and will do so guided and complying with the laws.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa