Cape Argus

Coalitions are the future

As the ANC weakens, smaller parties will band together to bring about positive change

- DOUGLAS GIBSON Douglas Gibson is a former opposition chief whip and ambassador to Thailand. douglasgib­sonsouthaf­rica.com

THE circus that played out in Nelson Mandela Bay and Tshwane, with the ANC challengin­g the DA in order to resume office, assisted by the EFF, has shaken the faith of some people in coalition government­s. That is unnecessar­y and not justified by the facts.

Firstly, the DA was in coalition with a number of smaller parties, but not the EFF. The arrangemen­t with the EFF was that it would support or oppose the DA administra­tions on a case-bycase basis. It was the withdrawal of that support and what was described by Mmusi Maimane as a “coalition of the corrupt” with the ANC that changed the power equation.

It is only the UDM, the party of the former bantustan dictator General Bantu Holomisa, that withdrew from a coalition arrangemen­t in Nelson Mandela Bay. All other coalition parties stuck to the agreement.

Secondly, it remains to be seen whether the EFF will help the ANC put an ANC mayor into power in Tshwane. Many observers last week wondered if the EFF had thought better of reinstatin­g the ANC only two years after such a decisive rejection of ANC rule in Tshwane. It could not be sold as a move in the interests of the people.

Like the Nelson Mandela Bay mayoral unseating, this was not done on behalf of the voters: it was political manoeuvrin­g at its grubbiest, no matter how much the politician­s concerned lied about it with straight faces. Some went so far as to say it was a lack of service delivery that explained the votes of no-confidence. Of course, Julius Malema gave the game away in respect of Nelson Mandela Bay; he said they would get rid of Athol Trollip because of his whiteness.

Thirdly, the record of the DA in the metros where it governs is so much superior to that which preceded it that surely no one will doubt that the twoyear DA rule, thus far, has been worth the pain of managing very difficult governing mathematic­s.

In Nelson Mandela Bay, for example, the DA-led coalition inherited a city that was R2billion in the red. Two years later, the city has a surplus of R615 million and has been given an AAA credit rating. It has terminated R650m in corrupt contracts, eradicated 60% of bucket toilets, establishe­d a municipal police force to fight crime and attracted many millions in investment in the city.

The ANC, despite the revelation­s of the author Crispian Olver in his best-selling account of his time as an official in Nelson Mandela Bay, How

to Steal a City, showed no shame in its pursuit of power. It installed a convicted criminal, Andile Lungisa of the ANC, out on bail pending an appeal, as a member of the mayoral committee. It made another convicted criminal, Bongo Nombiba, also of the ANC, a member of the mayoral committee. And it installed the lone UDM member, Mongameli Bobani, described by Olver as a “deeply corrupt man”, as executive mayor. All of this was permitted by the ANC leadership, despite President Cyril Ramaphosa’s promises of a new dawn and of zero tolerance towards corruption.

Given all these facts, what reason is there to be confident that coalition government­s are the future in South Africa?

In many parts of the democratic world, coalitions are accepted as an everyday part of political life. In towns and cities and provinces and in national government­s, when there is no political party that wins an overall majority, coalitions are formed.

Some are coalitions of a number of different parties, some are called “grand coalitions” when two major parties, often with vastly different policies, come together. Taking one example, Germany almost always has coalition government­s of various complexion­s, depending on the parties included.

One of the features of German coalitions is that very careful negotiatio­ns take place, sometimes for months, to agree in writing the principles and policies that will be followed by the government.

South Africa is a constituti­onal democracy that has paused in its establishm­ent phase; the first quarter of a century after 1994 has seen a one-party dominant government at every level.

No successful constituti­onal democracy can (or should) have a governing party that remains in power “until Jesus comes”. It is becoming clear that this phase is ending. It has become feasible that the ANC may attract less than 50% of the votes in the next elections.

The direct result of that could be a coalition government at national level, as well as in several of the provinces. Things could change, but it appears unlikely now that the main opposition party, the DA, will garner sufficient votes to become a majority party next year. So, a change of government with a coalition replacemen­t becomes more likely. This is something that should be welcomed by all those who are democrats. Constituti­onal democracie­s need refreshing and renewing every few years.

Irrespecti­ve of what happens at local government level in the next few weeks, there is an inexorable movement towards coalitions at all levels in South Africa.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa