Cape Argus

IMPACT FUNDS CAN PLAY POWER ROLE IN AFRICA

- CHARLES BUCHANAN Charles Buchanan is the managing director: Fund Services, Africa at SGG Group.

ONE OF THE most common complaints heard from the private equity community in Africa centres on the relative lack of availabili­ty of quality investment targets capable of delivering the returns expected by their limited partners (LPs), the underlying investors in their funds to whom they have a fiduciary duty to provide an expected rate of return on the capital deployed.

While this is by no means a problem unique to Africa, and is in fact a common refrain heard globally, Africa presents a unique challenge in terms of the limited number of investment opportunit­ies available as well as their comparativ­ely smaller scale.

This is largely a symptom of gross domestic product (GDP).

According to the World Bank, Sub-Saharan Africa’s GDP amounts to $1.649 trillion (R223.55trln), which represents just more than 2 percent of global GDP.

Africa still comprises a relatively small portion of the global economy, which makes it difficult for more commercial­ly-minded private equity funds that are not only tasked with finding quality investment targets, but are also competing with other investors for a limited number of potential acquisitio­ns.

However, this also represents a rather unique opportunit­y for impact investment funds to play a powerful role in meeting the investment needs of Africa.

If we consider the definition of impact investing as capital deployed for the purposes of making a positive social and environmen­tal impact, as well as generating financial returns for investors, then we see that this form of investment approach – with its more flexible return parameters

– is possibly better suited to a landscape where patient financial capital is not only a virtue but a necessity.

Since the concession­ary capital that is typically deployed into impact funds tends to originate from Developmen­t Finance Institutio­ns, quasi-government or government­linked sources with a specific agenda to effect change in certain sectors or geographie­s, the financial return criteria are somewhat more lenient than for their purely commercial­ly driven private equity peers.

While it is true that the LPs of impact funds are often still driven by financial returns, they are also often willing to accept a discounted return in exchange for the knowledge that their capital is making a meaningful social or environmen­tal impact.

Whereas commercial capital deployed into a strategic, but growing sector like education in Africa may target an internal rate of return upwards of 25 percent, an impact-oriented fund may be satisfied with return in the region of 12 percent provided it was achieving its social mandate.

Impact funding not only has the opportunit­y to be the patient capital that Africa needs, it is suited to the continent’s idiosyncra­tic risks.

Neverthele­ss, one shouldn’t fall into the trap of thinking that impact investing is not of sufficient scale to meet Africa’s investment requiremen­ts.

A report by the Global Impact Investing Network showed that the total assets under management of impact funds doubled in the last year to $228bn, up from an estimated $114bn since mid-2017.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa