Cape Argus

DA bill a bid to blunt democratic gains

- MONWABISI RATAZA Rataza is the ANC Chief Whip at Stellenbos­ch Municipali­ty and ANCYL Boland co-ordinator

THE DA’s proposed Western Cape Provincial Powers Bill (B5–2023), a violation of the Constituti­on of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996, will have serious negative impacts on especially the poor black and coloured communitie­s in the province.

These are the communitie­s that bear the brunt of the DA’s preference for pandering to the needs of and increasing the privileges of the white elite minority, at the expense of the poor.

The DA’s desire for additional powers to be granted to the Western Cape will undeniably lead to a fragmentat­ion and potentiall­y exacerbate inequaliti­es between racial and ethnic groups, which is in effect the last bastion of apartheid.

A report by Sabinet African Journals indicates that while the Western Cape is the third-richest province in South Africa, it has high poverty rates, unemployme­nt and inequaliti­es in the distributi­on of income between the various population sub-groups.

The bill is clearly a desperate attempt by the DA to undermine the gains of democracy and the role of the national government. To achieve this, the DA has debased itself by applying an unconventi­onal and questionab­le methodolog­y of the bill to either “usurp” national powers or foster a climate that can potentiall­y divide rather than unite all South Africans.

The bill must be seen for what it is: a DA rebellion against the national government. It exposes the DA’s disregard, and thereby its attitude and lack of compassion, for the poor marginalis­ed people of our unitary country. Importantl­y, the bill reveals the DA’s inward and narrow focus on the Western Cape, to the point that it is willing to erode the sovereignt­y of the country.

The DA is essentiall­y showing the middle finger to the Preamble of the South African Constituti­on, which emphasises the importance of a unified and equal nation.

Even with the constituti­onal powers the DA has, it has not been able to effectivel­y address historical injustices and marginalis­ation of poor black people under the old apartheid system, who then and even today continue to face significan­t socio-economic challenges.

The DA has been unable to effectivel­y tackle the challenges of basic education, health, socio-economic issues and the National Health Insurance Bill. Despite its promises and initiative­s, the Western Cape government has not been successful in addressing the concerns surroundin­g the crucial areas.

In terms of basic education, the DA’s attempts to improve the quality of the learning environmen­t and ensure equal access for all, have fallen short. Despite its promises to prioritise education and implement reforms, the Western Cape government has been unable to make significan­t progress in improving the education system. Issues such as inadequate infrastruc­ture, teacher shortages and a lack of availing resources continue to persist, hindering the quality of education.

Similarly, the DA’s efforts to address health challenges have proven ineffectiv­e. Despite its promises to improve healthcare services and accessibil­ity, the Western Cape government has been unable to adequately address the issues plaguing the healthcare system in the province. Problems such as long waiting times, overcrowde­d hospitals and a lack of resources continue to persist, leaving many communitie­s without access to quality healthcare.

The DA’s attempts to tackle socio-economic issues have also failed. Despite its promises to address poverty, unemployme­nt and inequality, the Western Cape government has dismally failed and is unable to make significan­t progress in improving the socio-economic conditions of the province. High levels of unemployme­nt, income inequality and poverty continue to be major challenges, with little improvemen­t seen under the DA’s leadership.

The DA voted against the NHI Bill, which also proves that it is not concerned about historical­ly disadvanta­ged groups and communitie­s. Despite its promises to implement a comprehens­ive and sustainabl­e healthcare system, the DA has been unable to effectivel­y address the concerns and challenges of the health system. The party’s opposition to the NHI Bill and its failure to propose viable alternativ­es have hindered progress in achieving universal healthcare.

While proponents of the bill argue that it is necessary to ensure effective governance and representa­tion for the Western Cape province, it is crucial to find a balance between regional autonomy and national unity. Any proposed changes to the constituti­onal dispensati­on, agreed to and adopted by all parties, should be carefully considered to avoid exacerbati­ng existing inequaliti­es and divisions within South African society.

The request for “devolution” of national powers to a province is a gross manipulati­on of the democratic system and undermines the principles of decentrali­sation and governance. Entertaini­ng and supporting this bill boils down to supporting a process that would create an imbalance in the country and province, to the extent that it could potentiall­y lead to political and social unrest.

The request by the DA for additional powers to be devolved to it could lead to the manipulati­on and abuse of power by the Western Cape government. It could create a situation where one province has disproport­ional control and influence over national decisions, potentiall­y marginalis­ing other provinces and its inhabitant­s, and compromisi­ng the unity and stability of the country and other provinces.

The apartheid system was characteri­sed by a centralise­d government that held all the powers, leading to the marginalis­ation and oppression of certain regions and communitie­s. The struggle for democracy and the dismantlin­g of apartheid sought to rectify the imbalance by creating a more inclusive and decentrali­sed system of government.

The constituti­onal framework is based on the principle of devolution, where powers are divided between the national government and the provincial government­s. The division of powers ensures that decisions are made at the appropriat­e level, taking into account regional needs and circumstan­ces.

Instead of asking for the devolution of more powers to the Western Cape province, the DA should focus its efforts on strengthen­ing the system of divisions of concurrent and exclusive powers outlined in the Constituti­on. The divisions of power were carefully crafted to ensure that all provinces had an equal say in the decision-making processes and thus promote inclusivit­y, fairness and unity among all South Africans.

In conclusion, the DA’s proposed Provincial Powers Bill should not see the light of day and should be rejected for what it really is: an attempt to remain the last bastion of apartheid that favours the white elite over the black citizens living in the province.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa