Cape Times

Africa will remain HIV/Aids world capital due to culture

- Gwynne Dyer Dyer is an independen­t journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries

FOUR years ago optimism was high that Aids was in retreat and could ultimately be eradicated.

Back then the Joint UN Programme on HIV/Aids (UNAIDS) was boldly predicting “the end of Aids by 2030”. Nobody is feeling that optimistic now.

New HIV infections, after dropping steadily for the 10 years to 2005, more or less stabilised at 2 million a year in the last decade, and the annual death toll from Aids has also stabilised at about 1.5 million a year. But the future looks grimmer than the present.

Two-thirds of all HIV-positive people (24 out of 36 million) are in Africa, and an even higher proportion of the Aids deaths happen there. If it were not for Africa, the prediction­s of four years ago would still sound plausible. So what’s wrong with Africa? Two things: its poor and there are “cultural practices” that facilitate the spread of the HIV virus.

The great achievemen­t of the Internatio­nal Aids Conference that was held in Durban 16 years ago was to break the grip of the big pharmaceut­ical companies on the key drugs that were already making HIV-positive status a lifelong nuisance rather than a death sentence in other parts of the world. Unfortunat­ely, the drugs were so expensive that the vast majority of Africans simply could not afford them – so they died instead.

In a diplomatic and media battle that lasted for almost a decade in the late 1990s and early 2000s, African countries managed to shame the big pharmaceut­ical countries into accepting the importatio­n of much cheaper “generic” versions of the main antiretrov­iral drugs, mainly from Brazil, India and Thailand, for use in poor African countries.

The Western drug companies not only dropped their collective lawsuit against the South African government in defence of their patents. Some of them even began providing their own patent drugs to the African market at one-tenth or even one-twentieth of the price they charged elsewhere.

A widely used course of treatment that cost $10 000 a year in the US at the time became available to Africans at a price of about $100 a year.

Many HIV-positive Africans could not even afford that amount, but Western government­s and private foundation­s also began providing major funding for anti-HIV programmes in Africa: $8.6 billion in 2014. (Eighty percent of the money comes from the United States and the United Kingdom.)

The continent’s death rate from Aids went into a temporary steep decline, but it is now heading back up for a number of reasons. The main one is that resistance to the standard mix of drugs has grown into a major problem.

The second-line treatment, using newer drugs that are still available at the “African discount”, costs $300 per person per year and resistance is also apparent in 30 percent of those cases. The third-line or “salvage” treatment costs $1 900 a year even in Africa. The government­s can’t afford it and very few Africans have medical insurance.

Drug resistance has been growing in the developed world too, of course, but the solution there is to move HIV-positive people onto newer combinatio­ns of drugs that are far more expensive.

The cost of treatment in the US today can be higher than $20 000 a year and not one African in a thousand can afford that.

African government­s will probably have to wage another long diplomatic and media battle to access generic or cut-rate versions of the best new drugs.

In the meantime, a great many people will die. And this is happening just as the amount of funding from Western sources for anti-HIV programmes in Africa has gone into decline: donations last year were down by almost 1 billion dollars.

The other specific reason for subSaharan Africa’s much higher rate of HIV infections is “cultural”.

What that means in plain English is that sexual traditions are different there: pre-marital and extra-marital sex is commonplac­e. Moreover, older men often exploit their relative wealth and power to have unprotecte­d sex with many young women and girls.

The situation in sub-Saharan Africa is almost bound to get worse not better because the 15-24 age group, the most likely to become infected, is growing explosivel­y fast. They number about 200 million now, but that will double to 400 million by 2040. Africa has long been the world capital of HIV and Aids and it will remain so for the foreseeabl­e future.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa