Cape Times

Unwieldy charter unlikely to result in true empowermen­t

- Giada Masina, Allan Reid and Deepa Vallabh Giada Masina, Allan Reid, Deepa Vallabh of Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

THE REVIEWED Broad-based Black Economic Empowermen­t Charter for the South African Mining and Minerals Industry was published and became effective on June 15. Although mining companies will surely wait for the outcome of the legal challenges to the charter by the Chamber of Mines, they need to start considerin­g what the charter will mean for their corporate structures if the challenges are unsuccessf­ul.

Meaningful transforma­tion remains an important imperative, and the industry remains committed to it. However, the ambiguous manner in which the charter has been drafted will pose significan­t challenges to those seeking to comply.

Most mining companies have specific corporate structures in place to cater for the previous 2010 charter’s black economic empowermen­t (BEE) requiremen­ts.

The reviewed charter published for comment in April last year contained stringent BEE structure requiremen­ts, including that every mining right needed to be housed in a separate special purpose vehicle, with each such structure being empowered.

The new charter is a slight improvemen­t, because it seeks to acknowledg­e existing right holders’ present corporate structures. However, a proper analysis of the provisions regarding ownership leave the mind reeling if one considers the various scenarios that could be relevant and the different requiremen­ts that would be applicable thereto.

It is clear that applicants for new rights must comply with the new requiremen­ts. A new mining right holder must have a minimum “black person” shareholdi­ng of 30 percent, allocated as follows: (i) a minimum of 8 percent to black employee share ownership plans; (ii) a minimum of 8 percent to mine communitie­s, through a community trust; and (iii) a minimum of 14 percent to “BEE entreprene­urs” (BEE allocation thresholds). A new prospectin­g right holder must have a minimum black person shareholdi­ng of 50 percent plus one.

Controvers­ially, the charter provides that a new mining right holder must, subject only to the Companies Act’s solvency and liquidity requiremen­ts, pay a minimum of 1 percent of its annual turnover in any given year to its black person shareholde­rs, prior to and over and above any shareholde­r distributi­ons. This creates a guaranteed dividend structure that previously was not a hard requiremen­t.

Payment provisions

In an ambiguous and unclear provision, the charter also seems to seek to regulate how payment for the black person shareholdi­ng will take place, with, ultimately, the holder or vendor writing off any unpaid balances at certain milestones.

Given the constraint­s of the current economic climate, these two requiremen­ts will further restrict the cash resources of mining companies seeking to remain viable and limit the extensive job losses historical­ly suffered by the industry.

The 30-percent stake must be held in a special purpose vehicle separate from the right holder. Should any black person hold shares within one of the BEE allocation threshold categories, such black person must ensure, when transferri­ng any shares, that the transferee falls within the same category.

Subject to such requiremen­t, the charter also restricts the extent that BEE entreprene­urs can dilute their shareholdi­ng. If adhered to, this provision will at least eliminate the “once empowered, always empowered” debate regarding new rights. However, it will render the shares held by such special purpose vehicles almost worthless, achieving negligible empowermen­t at enormous costs to the holder and its remaining shareholde­rs.

Additional­ly, the provision giving the 30-percent black person shareholde­rs the right to transport, trade and market their proportion­ate share of production will cause numerous mining companies to breach existing sales and offtake arrangemen­ts. The charter aims to recognise the historical BEE transactio­ns of existing mining and prospectin­g rights holders as follows:

Existing holders, whether currently at or below a black person shareholdi­ng of 26 percent, must top up their black person shareholdi­ng to 30 percent within 12 months. They do not need to adhere to the BEE allocation thresholds, and the top-up shares must be given proportion­ally to the existing BEE partners, unless the BEE partners have already exited the structure, in which case the top-up shares should be held by a BEE entreprene­ur. This requiremen­t limits allowing new BEE entrants into the structure and does not therefore necessaril­y cater for what the charter seeks to achieve: more broad-based BEE structures.

Existing holders who have maintained a black person shareholdi­ng of more than 30 percent may maintain their existing structures until the BEE partners exit the structure or upon the right’s renewal.

Historical transactio­ns

The charter states that the recognitio­n of historical BEE transactio­ns shall not apply to applicatio­ns for new rights, the renewal thereof or to “applicatio­ns in terms of section 11 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Developmen­t Act affected by such recognitio­n”. It therefore appears that, upon renewal of any existing rights, recognitio­n of historical BEE transactio­ns would no longer apply. Although unclear, this also appears to be the case where approval for a transactio­n involving a right transfer or the change of control of the holder is required.

If historical BEE transactio­ns are not to be recognised in such circumstan­ces, presumably the new applicatio­n requiremen­ts would be relevant. However, this is not stated specifical­ly. This could result in a scenario where an existing right holder complies with the transition­al requiremen­ts by June 14, 2018 and again has to comply when the right is renewed or if section 11 approval is required – but with entirely different requiremen­ts. This is onerous and impractica­l.

Therefore, although the intention may have been to recognise historical BEE transactio­ns and existing corporate structures to some extent, the various requiremen­ts applicable in different circumstan­ces will likely result in mining companies having to cater for various alternativ­e scenarios, through implementi­ng separate and complex structures. In an industry that requires true transforma­tion, one wonders how productive this will be and whether the costs associated with such restructur­es will reap the benefits intended to flow to a larger group of BEE beneficiar­ies.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa