Cape Times

Spin-offs for winning bid to host RWC

- Kabelo Khumalo

SOUTH Africa’s economy stands to receive a windfall of R27 billion should the country’s bid to host the 2023 Rugby World Cup be successful, after the government gave SA Rugby Union (Saru) the green light to proceed with bidding for the rights to host the month-long event.

The country last hosted the showpiece in 1995.

The announceme­nt by cabinet last week that it had approved the request for guarantees to the value of R2.7bn, which was required from World Rugby as a prerequisi­te in hosting the event, was welcomed by the sports and tourism fraterniti­es.

Jurie Roux, the chief executive of Saru, said on Friday that it would be a marvellous, inspiratio­nal nation-building moment to recapture some of the excitement of 1995, but it would also have enormous practical benefits for our country.

“Hosting the Rugby World Cup in 2023 would have an R27bn direct, indirect and induced economic impact on South Africa; R5.7bn would flow to low-income households; 38 600 temporary or permanent jobs would be sustained and there’d be an estimated R1.4bn tax benefit to the government,” Roux said.

Cabinet’s approvals brought certainly in the industry after the previous sports minister Fikile Mbalula had initially revoked rugby’s privilege of “hosting and bidding for major and mega internatio­nal tournament­s in South Africa” as a “consequenc­e of not meeting their own set transforma­tion targets”.

He had based the original decision to sanction rugby on a report from the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) on sports transforma­tion.

Despite Mbalula’s then lack of support, Saru went ahead and submitted its bid for the 2023 Rugby World Cup anyway.

Mbalula later changed his mind and gave his support to the bid, a support which was rubber-stamped by his successor Thulas Nxesi. Nxesi said hosting the tournament would have major spin-offs for the ailing South African economy.

“Cabinet has approved the overall proposed package for this tournament, which is an economic bid, which would minimise the demands on the fiscus as well as stimulate economic activity, employment and empowermen­t.

“The tournament will contribute to stimulatin­g our economy by supporting government priorities, especially as it relates to preferenti­al procuremen­t and adherence to the Sports Transforma­tion Charter and the sharing of the profits derived. The event will further boost our tourism and hospitalit­y sector,” Nxesi said.

If the country gets the nod, ahead of France and Ireland, to rugby’s culminate showpiece, it would mark a second major sporting event the country hosts in seven years after the 2010 Soccer World Cup.

A KPMG analysis in the wake of the 2010 Fifa World Cup showed the event had pumped an estimated R93bn into the local economy, re-branded South Africa and created a favourable climate for direct foreign investment and tourism growth.

Technicall­y strong

The African Response research showed that 96 percent of the 2010 Soccer World Cup visitors to South Africa said that they would possibly return to the country, while 92 percent said they would recommend the country to friends and family as a holiday destinatio­n.

However, on Friday trade union federation Cosatu said hosting the 2010 Soccer World Cup was not profitable for the country and believed the same would hold true for the Rugby World Cup.

“The country is yet to honestly quantify the benefits of hosting the 2010 Soccer World Cup that turned out to be nothing, but a festival of looting and cheating. That tournament was followed by the longest public service strike when workers were told that there was no money to pay for their salary adjustment­s,” Cosatu said.

Saru has previously bid unsuccessf­ully for 2011, 2015 and 2019 cups.

Mark Alexander, the president of Saru, said he was convinced at the fourth time of asking South Africa had produced on an unarguable case: “We believe our bid is technicall­y the strongest of the three, with our world-class venues and training facilities, tourism infrastruc­ture and wonderful climate.

“We will maximise the commercial benefit for World Rugby with a low-cost, high-return event in a country that has the infrastruc­ture and major event experience to turn on a colossal event with 2.9 million match tickets available for the showpiece,” Alexander said.

The successful country would have to pay World Rugby a tournament hosting fee of $150m (R2bn). World Rugby will announce the host nation for the 2023 Rugby World Cup in November.

 ?? PHOTO: BACKPAGEPI­X ?? Cosatu says holding World Cup Rugby will not benefit the country and follow in the footsteps of the soccer World Cup which was ‘a festival of looting and cheating’, yet others believe it will uplift the nation and boost the economy.
PHOTO: BACKPAGEPI­X Cosatu says holding World Cup Rugby will not benefit the country and follow in the footsteps of the soccer World Cup which was ‘a festival of looting and cheating’, yet others believe it will uplift the nation and boost the economy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa