Unions agree to wage deal
The company will exit its under-performing US shale oil and gas business
TWO MAJOR trade unions said yesterday they would sign a new wage agreement in the engineering sector, quelling fears of a strike. Solidarity and the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (Numsa) said that they would sign a three-year wage agreement with the Steel and Engineering Industries Federation of South Africa today. Numsa had previously demanded a wage hike of 15 percent across the board. Last month it had requested a certificate to strike in the engineering sector after wage talks deadlocked.
BHP BILLITON, the world’s largest miner, reported a surge in underlying full-year profits yesterday and said it would exit its underperforming US shale oil and gas business, pleasing disgruntled shareholders who had called for a sale.
The Anglo-Australian mining giant, which is under pressure from US hedge fund Elliott Management to rethink its investment in oil and boost shareholder returns, was buoyed by a recovery in industrial commodities markets.
It generated more cash than even in some years of the mining boom, slashed net debt by nearly $10 billion (R131.73) to $16.3bn and tripled its final dividend to $0.43 a share. The underlying profit of $6.7bn was below expectations for $7.4bn, but the market focused on the lower debt and the company’s determination to exit US shale, pushing its shares up 1.2 percent.
“Net debt looks very impressive… so the cash looks like it was applied to deleveraging versus extra dividends,” Shaw and Partners analyst Peter O’Connor said.
BHP joined other miners who have boosted payouts in the current earnings season to reward shareholders amid a resurgence in commodity prices.
Rio Tinto and iron ore miner Fortescue Metals both paid record dividends, while Anglo American reinstated its dividend. Facing calls from some shareholders to dispose of the shale business it acquired at the height of the oil boom, the miner said it was “actively pursuing options to exit.”
Chief executive Andrew Mackenzie said the preference would be a small number of trade sales, but refused to give a timetable for quitting the business.
“We certainly have plenty of people interested in taking a look,” Mackenzie said. “Our determination to exit means that we have other ways to exit that do not necessarily depend on… a competitive set of willing buyers.”
Fund managers including Elliott and Tribeca have been agitating for shale’s divestment, along with higher shareholder returns and the elimination of dual-structured Australia and London stock listings. Tribeca welcomed BHP’s comments that shale was no longer core to the company.
“That was our approach. We didn’t see it fitting strategically in BHP. We think they can realise value ahead of market expectations for the US onshore business,” Tribeca analyst James Eginton said. Elliott, which last week raised its stake in the miner’s London-listed arm to 5 percent, was not immediately available to comment. BHP chairperson Jac Nasser, who retires this year, has conceded the $20bn investment in shale six years ago was a mistake. Analysts have suggested the business could sell for about half that today. BHP’s underlying profit surged from $1.2bn a year ago as it benefited from a 32 percent rise in iron ore pricing in fiscal 2017, owing to greater demand from Chinese steel makers, which buy the bulk of its ore. Prices for copper, oil, coal, nickel and other commodities were also up, with only liquefied natural gas weaker.
Mackenzie reiterated BHP’s commitment to its conventional petroleum business that includes operations in the Gulf of Mexico, saying there were opportunities to make a lot of money over the next couple of decades. BHP swung to an attributable profit of $5.89bn from a record loss of $6.39bn a year ago. In fiscal 2016, the bottom line was hit by $7.7bn in writedowns, with Mackenzie vowing they would not be repeated in 2017.